Jason White-lock: Column Formula Revealed

by Crane Damage

Jason Whitlock. He’s the topic of ire from most KC residents. The only things KC locals like complaining about more than Whitlock are traffic jams at the triangle, the Royals and King Carl.

Why does Whitlock write the things he does? This writer thinks he has J-Dub’s formula figured out. It’s not as simple as him having the opposite-of-the-”popular” opinion, its that he writes articles contrary to the popular (implied or otherwise) “black community” opinion. As a black man, he has Carte Blanche to write about race issues in a way a white male sports writer cannot, yet he chooses to do the opposite of what is expected of him, making him controversial by default. Whitlock’s reign of terror has garnered him attention on Oprah, ESPN and Fox Sports because his reverse takes and “black attacks” makes him such an oddity. However, at most of these past gigs, like ESPN, his formula backfires.

As Americans begin to put the black-white issue behind us with a presidential candidate of color and wars with people of a lighter shade of brown in the middle east; Whitlock the race-baiter continues to spew his contrarian nonsense; turning the Klieg lights on and pointing them at issues that were non-existent until he decided to illuminate them to “get people talking”- like someone anointed him the Official Black Voice of Sports in America. “Get people talking” in KC usually amounts to message board flame wars about race, water-cooler talk of how bad of a writer he is, and barbs at his physical weight.

What if Jason Whitlock was white? A White Whitlock, from here on out, Whitelock, if you follow the formula, would write stories about how much he dislikes Barack Obama, 80s Night, and Grad School. All things White People like according to StuffWhitePeopleLike.com. (To clarify, his articles would be the opposite of typical things white people like these days…and if you get mad about Barack Obama, just substitute “Toyota Prius” or “Coffee“). He would write negative pieces on white water rafting, organic food and having black friends. (sub: country music, standing still at concerts or wine for any of those if you disagree.)

“…Black people are tired of letting idiots define who we are,” Whitlock said. “And it’s not on old black people like Cosby and Oprah. We have to police our own.” While I can’t comment much on that as a white guy, I agree with Whitelock’s take, I just question his motivations. Bill Cosby and Oprah have done a lot for the black community as a whole, in Cosby’s case a one time $20 million donation to Spelman College and a past and ongoing commitment to furthering the education and its importance to minorities. What has Whitelock done for the black community? Surely not defending it often, nor does he do anything to make the media more accepting of black writers and editors. In fact, he may be doing just the opposite.

Scoop Jackson wrote a column on how only four out of 305 sports editors are black, and said to high school students “”Which means you all (blacks) have a better chance to make it to the NBA than you do doing what I do for a living,” (journalism).

Whitlock’s response in a column, (aside from the Uncle Tom comment) that, also, isn’t available on the KC Star, but is here. The stupidity of such a comment could be laughed off and attributed to the writer’s desire to be viewed as a bigger star than LeBron James if I weren’t aware that many black youths have swallowed the self-defeating myth that white racism will prevent them from experiencing mainstream career success.” Just another example of his counter-point formula recipe. To quote a message board post – “Whitlock reminds me of the Black cop that is harder on Black suspects than his white partner…just to show that he is impartial.”

He’s not consistent, however. What’s crazy is Whitelock will spew these perceived black-backward views; then turn around and say something like this; “(Charlie) Weis’ new 10-year contract, (Notre Dame) reportedly worth between $30 million and $40 million … that strikes me as racist.” Whitelock also drew more criticism his black peers for his comments on NBA All Star game in Vegas, “David Stern seriously needs to consider moving the event out of the country for the next couple of years in hopes that young, hip-hop hoodlums would find another event to terrorize. All Star Weekend can no longer remain the Woodstock for parolees, wannabe rap artists and baby’s mamas on tax refund vacations.”

Its these opinions from Whitelock that make him stick out as a controversial black man in the media, and why you get this broad mix of people who either love him or hate him. Racists love him for the backward views – a black banging on the blacks, and the true minorities think he is a mouthpiece for the white media…but the empowerment, bootstrap African-American crowd loves him, while the PC college grad/grad school (shh…liberal) white readers think he’s full of shit. Win,win/win-win for the Star. A shrewd, but risky strategy that has paid off in spades for the Star, no pun intended, and afforded Whitelock a Ruth’s Chris budget. (You didn’t think I’d keep this free of a fat joke did you?)

He keeps his job in KC because the Star believes that the average, white, Joe Friday reader opens up the paper in his Leawood McMansion and turns straight to Whitelock for justification of his views- like tattoos ruining the NBA or hating Larry Johnson’s money and Maybachhs, so he can wail to his wife about how stupid (or smart depending on his racism barometer) he is as she runs out the door to the plaza with his plastic burning a hole in her overpriced purse. KC’s fans deserves better journalism.

I don’t hate Whitlock on a personal level, and would sometimes rather read him than some of the PollyAnna Posnanski pieces about how “this year is gonna be different for the Royals”. I just see through his transparent motivations for his subject matter and demand better from a journalistic standpoint than who Whitelock sat with at the Staples Center the night before or fake, contrarian opinions that are only blood in the water for racist message board lurkers to drive traffic to the Star’s site. Keep it real, yo.

Never miss a chance to get your fix! Follow Arrowhead Addict on Twitter and be sure to like our Facebook page.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments
Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

This discussion is varied for sure - I will be back most def!

JW opinions have nothing to do with being black white pink or green. He is an individual and yes blacks folks are not monolithic. He is also small and insecure and a jerk.

Crane,

This is a response to your comments--I am not coming after you OR your article. I get SOOO pissed whenever I read his stuff, as well. I just wanted to spend a moment explaining why I think Whitlock is what he is. I completely agree with you that he is a complete tool, but just whining about it doesn't do it for me; let's look into why he's a tool. I only used the "Whitey keeping the black man down" (something that he does write about often) as one example of his insistence to use race as an excuse to challenge and press us. That is why we don't like him--because he presses us to think things we don't want to.

Please re-read my super-long comment; I am not going against you. I like that you're swinging the hammer, but I'm just trying to aim the hammer. Chillax, bro.

-cw

correction: Most biased news in the free world, not Earth. I almost forgot about places like China and N. Korea and stations like Al Jazeera which, undoubtedly are worse. Fox is to Republican News what The Landry Hat is to Homerism. Enough politics. Let's get back to football, shall we?

C-Webb-
I didn't call Whitelock a bad writer, I said that's sometimes the topic of water cooler talk in KC.

I think you should re-read this column after you have chilled from Fox News, the most biased news on Earth.
If you closely look at Whitlock columns, you'll find just the opposite of "Whitey keep the black man down." He talks about black people needing to improve themselves and not look for "the man" to help them out. He bashes hip-hop "gangsta" culture, and I cited many irrefutable examples of this in the article. I was just making the point often, what makes him controversial is how he often sits on the other side of the fence from popular black opinion. Sorry I irritated you but I think you missed the point.

Thanks for taking it out on me?

BTW, sorry that comment was so long! Just had to rant. No offense to you, Crane--this was, amazingly enough, an attack on something I saw on FOX News recently that had been burning me up.

-cw

I'm not gonna lie--I usually like Crane's stuff, but this irritated me. To say that Whitlock forms opinions that you we all disagree with from time to time is a given. (I can't wait to see what he says about this Pacman Jones/Imus thing in regards to Jemele Hill calling the Celtics "Hitler"-esque.) 99.9% of the time, when I see J-Dubbs wrote a column, I get steamed even before I click the link. Who's it gonna be today, Whitlock? Herm Edwards? King Carl? Jeff George?

However, to say he is a bad writer is incorrect. He creates an argument, "proves it" (in his own mind, not to most of us), and gives plenty of examples of why he thinks what he thinks. Additionally, he does it without grammatical, syntactic, or logical errors; even the least journalistically-experienced mind can tell that, unlike Hill, Whitlock has experienced editors that are looking over his shoulders. (Adam/Zach, expect a post about this from me in the future--this one grinds my gears.)

While I disagree with JW 99% of the time, I realize that many times, he is going too far off the deep end to challenge our own thinking (a rhetorical device called "hyperbole"). This is something that politicians, orators, TV personalities, and teacher do in their respective fields all the time (and I plan on doing to my own students). Just because they're pushing an issue doesn't mean they genuinely believe it--they just want us to find out how much WE agree/disagree with it. It's a technique that helps us look into ourselves and develop as people (or, in a smaller KCStar-sense, sports fans).

I think most people, nationally, know Whitlock is full of shit in a lot of issues. I think he absolutely does turn most of his columns into unnecessarily into "How Whitey keeps the proud black man down" rants. The difference comes when we get a genuinely race-related issue like Rutgers/Imus, Whitlock gets his argument teed up for him so he can hit it right out of the park. That's really where he gets his credibility. Outright racial insensitivity is indefensible; when someone in the media says something like this, it gives carte blanche to the "defenders of the race" (i.e. Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson) to stand up for themselves.

You can't turn on any type of news program anymore without facing political bias from one side or the other--our language isn't built to speak completely, 100% objectively. We like what we like, and we're not afraid to share that opinion. The trouble comes from when we let those opinions become fact and define who we are and what we believe. When reading Whitlock, or Posnanski, or Bill Simmons, or Crane, or me (especially me), or Adam, or whoever, keep in mind what is fact, what is opinion, and what word choices we're making that are influencing your mind. It's not enough to ride shotgun in this world--be aware of what goes into your mind; be in charge of what stays.

-cw

I stopped paying serious attention to Jabba the Whitless years ago. He has so many axes to grind.

DAMAGE!!

Great read, Crane!

We all know that I'm not too high on the Joeson Posnansklock "dynamic" duo these days.

I don't really have much of an opinion here. Whitlock is fat and kinda stupid. That's pretty much it for me. It's not like we can really draft journalists.

And I like Joe Posnanski.