Walter Football Preview

by Chiefs
WalterFootball.com Chief Preview

I was reading Crane’s week in review and checked this article out. Well, the venom seemed to be flowing from Walter’s keyboard. He certainly has strong feelings on the Chiefs. So, I felt compelled to put down my thoughts while reading his hit piece article. My comments/reactions are under each quote.

2008 Kansas City Chiefs Offense:
Once upon a time, the Chiefs had the most dominant offensive line in pro football. Willie Roaf and John Tait were prolific bookend tackles; Will Shields was one of the top guards in the league; while Brian Waters and Casey Wiegmann were also exceptional at left guard and center, respectively. So, how did their offensive front go from being so dynamic to surrendering 55 sacks and failing to open up any running lanes (3.3 yards per carry)?

Good and accurate starting point.

Carl Peterson is to blame.

Ah, good old CP, the favorite whipping boy. OK, Walter, let’s see where you go with this.

He watched Roaf retire. He was there when Shields called it quits the following year.

This is his fault? Did he refuse to use his magic anti-aging and healing powers?

He let Tait defect for Chicago in free agency.

Let? Does a player need permission to sign with another team? The fact was that Tait was a RT for us who could get paid to be a LT for other teams. I hated to lose him, but those are the things that happen in the salary cap era.

He saw Wiegmann rapidly age (now 35).

Again with the aging comments. Where are these magic powers you imply CP has?

Peterson hadn’t done a single positive thing to replenish the offensive front until obtaining Branden Albert with his second first-round selection in April’s draft.

Now, we circle back to some truth. This is my major beef with CP’s drafts the last 6 years or so. He didn’t spend enough good picks on the O-line. Part of the problem was poor drafting on the D-line resulting in too many additional picks being made there. Another problem was the inability of the Chiefs to develop young O-lineman with the picks they made.

Right tackle Damion McIntosh, a Miami Dolphins reject, is absolutely horrific, but even he is better than right guard Adrian Jones, perhaps the worst starting offensive lineman in the entire league.

Wow, horrific for D-Mac? That is way out of line. He is a decent, not great lineman and played much of last year hurt. Adrian Jones perhaps the worst starting lineman? He is learning to play guard for one. This evaluation is based on what? His play at Tackle? His play in mini-camp?? To call this unfair is an understatement.

The front office and coaching staff are high on Brodie Croyle, which shouldn’t be too encouraging because Peterson is an inept general manager, while Herm Edwards is one of the worst Xs-and-Os coaches in league history (though no one can question his motivational skills).

I love the ‘logic’ in this argument. It basically breaks down this way. I don’t like A and B. So, if A and B like X, then X has to stink. CP is inept? Please, I don’t care if you don’t like him. Give credit where credit is due. CP was part of the Super Bowl Eagles, he was GM for two USFL championships. Up until last year, the teams he has been associated with won over 60% of their games. Inept? I don’t think so. If you want inept, give Matt Millen a call. Herm as a bad X and O’s coach? I’ll touch on that a bit later.

In six career starts, Croyle has more picks (8) than touchdowns (6). His completion percentage is 56.3. He had four fumbles last year. And more importantly, he has no career victories.

OMG, no wins in your first 6 games? Well, I guess the only honorable solution involves a hari cari knife. I am sure a good QB would have found a way to win at least one game with no pass protection and little running game.

The odds that the Chiefs drafted two consecutive Dwayne Bowes is slim to none.

Well, they are probably higher than the odds of you being a good talent evaluator.

Remember when I bashed Edwards a few paragraphs ago? Well, one of the dumbest things I’ve ever seen him do is single-handedly ruin Larry Johnson’s career by giving him 416 carries in 2006. Prior to last season, I wrote that you should avoid Johnson in your fantasy leagues at all cost. Johnson missed eight games, and even when he was in the lineup, he struggled, averaging just 3.5 yards per carry. Thanks to Edwards’ foolishness and the ineptness of the Chiefs’ offensive line, it’s very unlikely Johnson bounces back in 2008. There’s just too much wear and tear. Is rookie Jamaal Charles the answer if Johnson gets hurt again? I’m not sure, but I’m confident we’ll find out before Thanksgiving.

OK, back to bashing Herm’s X’s and O’s/playcalling. Walter…. come in real close, this is important. Do I have your attention? Good. I am only going to say this once: HEAD COACHES DO NOT CALL PLAYS!

Got it? Good. You see, in the NFL there are these people. They are called coordinators. The offense has one and the defense has one. You see, these are the guys that call the plays. Do you want to bash Mike Solari? Go ahead, right now his is a pinata in Chiefland. Yes, I know he is not around anymore so that doesn’t really help your case out for 2008.

2008 Kansas City Chiefs Defense:
It’s hard to score points when you’re not on the field, and that’s another obstacle Kansas City’s offense will have to overcome.

Hard to score points when the offense is not on the field. Wow, genius at work here. I am in awe. Let me write that down. Hard to score… points…. OK, I got it now. Learning is wonderful.

Jared Allen is gone. Regarded by many as the premier defensive end in the NFL, Allen had 16 sacks in 2007. I have no idea how the Chiefs are going to pressure the quarterback. They’ll still have Tamba Hali, who was second on the team with eight sacks. But with Allen gone, Hali will face more double teams, as there is no potent rusher across from him. Turk McBride, a converted under tackle, will be the guy to initially take over for Allen.

Well, Turk McBride is taking over for Jared Allen? Do you do research before you write? Tamba is taking over for Jared and Boone is taking Tamba’s old spot. I do hope Turk can show enough to be the starting LDE though.

Going from 37 team sacks to about 22 is going to put a lot more pressure on Kansas City’s secondary, which is in a bit of a transition phase.

So, you are assuming that We just lose Jared’s sacks and no one else doesn’t anything more? That includes Dorsey with zero sacks. I am reminded of your slim and none comment.

Safety Ty Law is gone. Corner Patrick Surtain, 32, seriously struggled in 2007.

So, Ty Law is a safety? Who knew? I thought he played CB last year. I hope this is a misprint and not further evidence of your ‘research’. Surtain did struggle last year though.

I’ve talked about how flawed the Chiefs’ defensive line and secondary is, so it should come as no surprise that the linebacking corps is a mess as well. Actually, let’s scratch that. The linebacking corps, save for Derrick Johnson, is a mess.

A mess??? Please, they were a solid unit last year. Donnie is on the way out, but still plays decent.
I don’t want to call the battle for the middle linebacker position a “competition.” Let’s refer to it as a “contest to see who sucks less.” The challengers are the completely horrendous Napoleon Harris and 35-year-old Donnie Edwards. My money is on Edwards, which speaks volumes about how terrible Harris is. If Edwards wins the job, Atlanta Falcons reject Demorrio Williams will start at weakside linebacker. If Harris is the man in the middle, Edwards will stay on the weak side.

Wow, for the 14th ranked defense last year, we certainly sucked a lot. The contest to see who sucks less? I get that feeling reading your article. What part of your analysis sucked less, Offense or Defense???

Well, needless to say he predicts 3 wins for us. It seems generous, based on his analysis. Basically he thinks well of only a few Chiefs. Based on that, I was expecting him to predict one to zero wins for us.

Never miss a chance to get your fix! Follow Arrowhead Addict on Twitter and be sure to like our Facebook page.

Comments
Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Well the same usually applies for my comments as well, dude. Particularly the "don't you write for Walter Football" comment I directed at Adam.

That wasn't intended to be mean or hateful. It was just a smartassed comment comparing the pessimism.

If I acted like it was sooo ludicrous, I would have written more than give me a break.

In the future, take my comments and articles with a grain of salt. They are often written with tongue fully in cheek.

You don't have to have an insult or dis in your comments to get your point across, often it backfires as you have found out. These are comments, not a debate.

It was a funny link. I showed it to a friend of mine the first time I got a chance.

What sparked this whole thing was you acting like it was just soooo ludicrous that I would prefer a winning season to a top ten pick any day of the week. Monday? Yep. Tuesday? Yep. Wednesday-Sunday? Absolutely. Chinese New Year? You bet.

And it got out of hand. And I'm partially responsible for that and I apologize.

My parting shot

"Nice find with the “douchebags with hot chicks” site. Definitely great for a couple laughs :D."
SeanBcool

That doesn't quite align with the end of #45 above.

Lets be friends Sean because you obviously love me and hate me at the same time...

None of this would have happened if it wasn't for that "second-rate" Walter Football link. argh.

We also shouldn't treat these comments like a courtroom ...I'm out too. I guess I'm going to have to clam up for a month again.

Whitlock has...personally, I love me some Crane Damage. Some Chiefs fans get their panties in a wad if opinions aren't 100% optimistic. Sorry to disagreeable and shake things up, but not everyone believes that we are going to win eight or more games this year, nor that that is the path to the Super Bowl. We haven't had a lot of top ten picks either, and maybe that's been the problem. Especially QB-wise. A good deal of successful QBs are picked in the first half of the first round.

Anyway, I'm rolling out of this debate. It got a little too intense over here. All I want to say is that nobody should ever get upset that someone is being realistic or even pessimistic when it comes to the Chiefs. You don't have to have blinders on to be a loyal fan. I just want to remind fans that, because sometimes I think I and other Chiefs writers and bloggers practically get impaled any time they don't give a glowing review or prediction.

Your name should be SeanIsntCool.

Crane Damage is the title of my columns, that's why I said real Crane Damage in Dallas, and I only really posted that after the Landry Hat stuck his nose in our business.

You can not like me all you want buddy, I won't lose any sleep. Whitlock has made a career out of guys like you.

correction to post 45:

No one died as a result of the crane accident, three were just severely injured. My bad. Nevertheless, not that funny.

And by the way, perhaps I should highlight some things for you:

"We are *RELATIVELY* deep at O-line *FOR THE MOMENT*."

"And right now we have 17 offensive linemen *TO WORK WITH* before our roster is finalized."

Just thought I'd point those key words out to you since you appear to be context-blind. The "hooked on phonics" comment was more or less giving you the benefit of the doubt. Figured maybe if you can't read all the words you have an excuse for ignoring their meaning.

The entire point of my arguments thus far has been that no one knows what's going to happen. Not me, not anyone. And I haven't pretended to. I've simply made cases for what COULD happen.

And I still don't see you having any sort of point other than that I was a dick. Have top ten picks gotten us a playoff win? No, nor have they even gotten us any valuable players so far. Basically, you haven't given a single reason to hope for a losing season/high draft pick. And I still find the whole idea ludicrous and feel that hoping for losses is a destructive attitude to have.

I have no problem with opinions that are different than mine. What I have a problem with is opinions that are stated as facts, and people who twist others' words to try to make their points seem more valid.

I value and appreciate the work done on this site by the likes of merlinnj, Zach, and Adam. You on the other hand, have failed to show me anything but tasteless jabs at construction accidents that cost a man his LIFE and "hot chicks with douchebags." Great contributions, brother. Bravo.

Sean-
I told Adam and Zach I wasn't going to get into this sort of thing with people like you a while back, but in this case I'll make an exception considering your off-base comments.

Picking in the 20s has gotten us what exactly? Aside from 3 players that are still on the team...

It sure hasn't gotten us a playoff win!
We aren't deep at O line, and if you really think that then fine. If we were, we wouldn't be considered having the worst line in football bc CP let it go to the wayside. I don't consider saying "give me a break" belitting your opinions, or being an asshole.

Maybe I should have just wrote..."I disagree" so you could have handled it like an adult.

By the way, I caught your boy Adam Schefter plagurizing when I went and met with Woody Paige in Denver when A.S. worked for the Denver Post. He basically bit Rick Reilly word for word from a 2 year old column and I met with Woody about that and other things when he first started on ESPN on Around the Horn with Max Kellerman.

Don't call me an asshole when your comments have all sorts of hoity-toity douchebaggery permeating them ...i.e. ..."And if you’ll refer to your hooked on phonics workbook, perhaps you can sound out the part" and "Oh wait, I think I know you. Do you also write for Walter Football?"

...then to top it off, you talk out of both sides of your mouth when you said the following in this thread.

"And to pretend that you know what’s going to happen this season, at this point in time, is nothing short of foolish."---Which therefore makes everything you say mean nothing by your own admission.

Making a good point is what the comments are about...not trying to make everyone agree with you and being a jerk if they don't. Apparently, you only love opinions when they are similar to your own.

intention* not attention. WTF?

I realize my comments came off as hateful. It wasn't my attention and I apologize. I did not mean for you to take offense.

I'm glad you guys express your opinions. I love opinions. I have opinions. That's all fine and dandy.

But the original comment was in response to Crane, who directly belittled MY opinions. Had he simply disagreed, and maybe even presented an argument, everything would have been cool. Instead, he chose to be an asshole, and I retaliated.

*claps slowly*

Not to spur this on any more than it already has been, but that was a second-rate comment Sean. I think I see what you were trying to say, but it came off ugly. No big deal.

Come on people. Save the hatred for the Fader fans. Lets all take our Prozac and play nice now...

Sean,

Here's the thing. We're not a news site. We're not trying to be. We are an op-ed blog site run by fans. The emphasis of this site is to entertain and spark conversation and even debate. There are plenty of places where you can go for just-the-facts-ma'am news. I'm not saying we ignore the news, but our news coverage is more about how we perceive the news than the actual news itself.

Additionally, we do not work for the Chiefs. I'm not Bob Gretz. I'm not going to brown nose the Chiefs or paint a pretty horizon for Chiefs fans when that's not what I see. I think as Chiefs fans who started a site who were lucky enough to see it become successful, yes, we owe it to other fans to be honest about the team. Now, that does not mean that we know more than our readers. But we do know the game of football. Zach is a football coach. I played some college ball and covered the sport professionally. Crane has worked all over in the fields of media and sports. C-Webb is a journalism major. Merlin and Steven obviously are experts when it comes to everything in between the trenches. We never try and put ourselves above the readers and the fans, but rather it is our intent to represent you and give Chiefs fans a place where they can talk shop with other Chiefs fans.

I think our goal was originally to be the most-entertaining, unique, opinion-oriented Chiefs site on the web, and one where all Chiefs fans could have a voice, when we started, and I honestly think we've accomplished all of that. That's why we take offense to the "second-rate" comment. I don't see myself as a second-rate blogger or writer. Zach isn't a second-rate football expert, website designer or photoshop guy. And on and on and on...we are a blog, more along the lines of Deadspin for Chiefs fans than ESPN or even Pro Football Talk for Chiefs fans. I hope that makes sense, and we won't apologize for that. We wanted to carve our niche and bring the best aspects of blogging to the Chiefs. That's it.

So, I think you may have things twisted about us. No big deal, though, as everyone has their opinion. I just think it's a little lame to bag on us for not being Eisen or Schefter or even PFT when we clearly aren't even trying to be.

I also think that as the president of Kevin Costner's fan club you are still pissed about the post and the Waterworld comments. Just playing :)

OK, that's fine. My only point was that it's not like this is NFL.com or ESPN or something. It's not that I don't like this site. If that were true, I wouldn't check it daily.

The term "second-rate" wasn't even intended to be an insult. It's just honesty, and was in response to your colleagues Adam and Crane pretending that their opinions should be treated as expert analysis. The difference in a blog and an official news website is that the opinions expressed on blogs are just that: opinions. By biased fans, not objective journalists.

I apologize if my comments offended you, but as Adam said, "I speak my mind".

If you feel like you have to label us, but again we are a blog.

Fine, let me correct myself:

Second-rate sports website. Better?

Sean if you think that this is a "second-rate sports blog" you can go find another blog.

As I stated previously, a high draft pick is what you look forward to because your team had a shitty year. It's like the silver lining. It is NOT, however, an accomplishment nor a goal.

Yeah, Crane. I suppose your right that picking in the 20s has gotten us nothing. Only Larry Johnson, Dwayne Bowe, and Tamba Hali. What did our last top 10 pick get us? Oh yeah, RYAN SIMS. You have no case here.

I never said I was happy with 8-8, because 8-8 doesn't get you the 25th pick in the draft, now does it? I would however, rather have an 8-8 season than a 4-12 one.

As far as the comment about this being a second rate sports blog, it is. And if you'll refer to your hooked on phonics workbook, perhaps you can sound out the part where I mentioned that I post here to discuss issues with fellow fans. Expanding on that, I check this site for updates on my team. When I want expert analysis, I check NFL.com. You are not Adam Schefter or Rich Eisen, so let's not make that mistake.

Game, set, match. Thanks.

I think both sides are making valid points here.

I don't WANT the Chiefs to suck this year. I'd much rather see 9-10 wins than 4-5, I think we all would.

But if we only get 4-5 wins, as painful as it would be to watch, it would be fine for two reasons:

1. There will be player development this year, no matter what. Trust.

2. Herm and Kuharich do an AMAZING job with the draft. There's really no reason to fear that we'd be falling into a never ending shit pit a la Cards/Lions/Faders.

Yes, I do hope for a pretty decent amount of wins and I'll never root for anything less, but think about what the boys could do with another top 5 draft! Holy Christ! We'd be straight up solid for the next several years! Anyone else smell...dare I say it? Dynasty?

By the way Sean- you sure spend a lot of time writing on a "second-rate sports blog".

That's a Busch league comment and you know it.

Just because we don't bite on Carl and Herm's sunshine-y commentary doesn't mean we're wrong...it means we've been down that road before.

Lets resume this discussion after the last round of cuts and see how many of those 17 are still on the team... I know Glenn Dorsey will still be there. We've picked in the 20's for the last 20 years basically and that's not working. You have to stink at some point to get some talent and not luck out with Jared Allen draft picks. New England, Indy and SD were all doormats and look at them now. We can't be in the middle to top and be happy with 8-8 like you are apparently.

Crane:

Give you a break?

We are currently employing 9 tackles, 6 guards, and 2 centers. It's early. Trading isn't even done. And right now we have 17 offensive linemen to work with before our roster is finalized. Yes, I would consider that relatively deep.

As far as the fact that I would rather pick 25th than 5th, that is 100% true. Picking 5th means we suck. Picking 25th means we're contenders. If you want to be the kind of fan that puts more value in high first round picks than wins, go to Detroit. I'm sure the Lions will satisfy all your needs.

Give ME a break, dude. Christ.

Rather pick 25th than fifth?

Relatively deep at O-line?

Give me a break.

Tim Tebow is an amazing, phenomenal talent. In college. I agree that he won't see the same kind of success in the NFL, especially since he won't be able to run it 15 times a game.

I really like John-David Booty, and I wish we had taken a look at him if we were going to try to draft a QB at all.

Ok, after listening to a few of you, I'm a bit worried. I'm hearing "high draft pick next year so we can draft a franchise QB". That worries me, because the person in that catbird seat is Tim Tebow. And I'll tell yah, as much as I try to get excited about Tebow, the more I feel the guy is overhyped to play in the NFL. For starters, he is a lefty. That will screw up our entire budding O' line. And, I think they play a spread offense, don't they? Plus, his taste in women is kinda trashy (in my opinion). Ironicly, I think Croyle has good taste in women, haha. Also, Tebow runs the ball alot. He is not gona get away with that in the NFL. I don't know. I'm not saying Tebow will be a bust. I'm saying that of the last 3 "cant miss QB's"...Jamarcus Russell, Brady Quinn, Matt Ryan...Tim Tebow fills me with the most dread as a potential bust in the NFL. Again, I could be wrong, but I get quezy thinking about the guy on the chiefs.

If we do draft in the top 5 again, I would much rather go after Oher than a franchise QB. Our second pick should be for a QB or maybe ILB. I don't really know that much about the up and coming QB's, after Tebow, but im pretty sure they wont be as talented, and as much as a steal, as I think Brohm was (with 2 3rds trading up for Brohm in the 2nd). But thats just me.

Oh, I also think at least 2 of our 3 3rd's will be starters. Charles and Morgan. Dunno about Cottam. I still woulda been willing to sacrafice Charles or Morgan for Brohm.

I also get the sense that people feel that if we would have drafted Brohm, it would be to oust BC early this season. I disagree. Contrary to popular belief, I feel we should play Croyle all this season, and basicly do what the raiders did with Russell. A new QB really should have at least a year in the NFL before potentially starting, anyways.

Even if we do draft a QB in 09, he probably shouldnt play till 2010.

Green Bay did it right. They have a starting QB that they have been grooming since the 05 draft, for christ sakes, in Aaron Rodgers. I think he will be good. And, to hedge their bets, they drafted Brohm and Flynn. Thats how you find a franchise QB. Bring a hot shot in to motivate your starting field general. It worked with the Browns. And we all know Herm loves competition.

My dream scinereo is that Anderson works out for the Browns and Rogers works out for GB. If we could get either Brohm or Quinn in some kinda trade, I would die of happyness. Other than that, I don't put alot of faith in the 09 QB selection. But who knows, it's early.

Oh wait, I think I know you. Do you also write for Walter Football?

I have faith that Brodie Croyle CAN (not saying he WILL) be a more-than-competent quarterback in the NFL. Why? Because he possesses the physical skills, for one. He can make every single throw, and he has better movement and arm strength than many successful quarterbacks in the league. His success depends on his ability to play the game at a pro level, MENTALLY. Seeing as he's a quarterback that has been a pro for only two years, and never started a full season, there's no reason to believe that day won't come. Quarterback is probably the hardest position to play in football, no less the hardest one to make a transition at from the college to pro ranks.

I never said we would be competing for "the big enchilada". In fact, I specifically stated quite the opposite. Or do you choose to ignore the things that are inconvenient to you?

The Chiefs face an extremely soft schedule this year, and seem to have addressed most major problem areas adequately. So I see no reason why a winning season is impossible. I'm sorry that you're a pessimist and I'm a realist, but writing for a second-rate sports blog (as much as I enjoy discussing issues with fellow fans here) does not make you the end-all-be-all of football, nor even an expert.

Setting yourself and other Chiefs fans up for disappointment is what seems foolish to me. But what do I know?

Sean,

One thing you have to remember is that Carl is still running a business here. Obviously, they didn't think any of the top quarterbacks available where they picked were worth the money. Now, with Brodie, of course they have to give him their endorsement--they want to sell tickets.

If Carl came out and said, "well, we're not sure Brodie can stay on the field, let alone win. It's going to be a long year." How many tickets would the Chiefs sell. Carl, Herm, etc...they have to have on their poker faces. Always.

And nobody is saying for us to become a perennial cellar dweller like Detroit or Zona. I'm just saying we aren't going to contend for the Big Enchilada--and, wake up if you disagree, because we're not--so I want us to pick early enough to FINALLY draft a franchise QB.

Brodie is not the future of our franchise. I don't give a damn what Carl says. I've see enough to feel more than comfortable with that assessment. Mostly because he is just too frail. He could prove me wrong, but I seriously, seriously doubt it.

Perhaps you should consider my 2 paragraphs of reasoning before acting like I'm a media sheep.

Namely 12 draft picks and no quarterback selected. Also, last year the answer was "it's an open competition, anyone can take the job." That's hardly throwing anyone under the bus. This year the message seems to be "we're giving it to Brodie, we think he can be our starter this year." That's not only been the vocal response to inquiries on the situation, but it's shown in the team's actions as well.

I never said our line was fine. I just said we're deep there at the moment. And that means possibilities. Frankly, I'm almost more concerned about our wide receivers than I am the line at this point.

Now I'm not saying we're gonna come out and beat the Patriots in week one and make the AFC Championship. I think that would take a miracle. But look at the Packers last year. The most positive prediction I heard for them was that there was no way they would win more than 8 games. They almost went to the Super Bowl, on an extremely young roster.

Basically, none of us have any clue how this season is going to turn out. Training camp hasn't even started yet! And to pretend that you know what's going to happen this season, at this point in time, is nothing short of foolish.

Sean -

Well they aren't going to come out and say the guys sucks and will never be a good QB. No Coach or GM is going to throw a player under the bus like that. So if you want to believe everything that Carl and Co. say I think you might be in for a rude awakening. These were the same guys, except Chan, that said our OL was going to be just fine last year. Did you believe that too?

But look at it this way:

Carl Peterson, Herm Edwards, and the Chiefs know more than we do about the situation than we do, and they have a lot of faith in Brodie Croyle. So much faith that they didn't spend a single one of their TWELVE available draft picks on a quarterback. If there was a time to draft a QB to replace Croyle, the 2008 draft was it.

Chan Gailey, an accomplished NFL Offensive Coordinator, has also expressed a lot of confidence in our young QB. Furthermore, I can pretty much guarantee you that our new offense is more or less tailored toward Croyle. Considering all of this, I think Brodie will do just fine.

We're relatively deep at O-line and running back for the moment. There's no real reason to assume that the Chiefs can't post a winning record this year, and I'd rather have a winning team than one that gets exciting draft picks. There's a good reason I don't root for Detroit or Arizona.

Well, I think it is OK for the fans to have different goals than the actual team. I mean, we know we aren't going to win the Super Bowl, so unless Brodie Croyle really, really steps up and stays healthy (a lotta ifs) and helps us win a bunch of games and make the playoffs, I want to finish somewhere where we can draft a franchise QB. That's just me, though. I'm sick of being mediocre, and willing to sacrifice the short-term future for the ultimate goal--a Super Bowl.

Adam, I believe a high draft pick should be viewed as something to look forward to after a poor season. And that's kind of how it's intended. As a compensation of sorts.

However, I don't believe that it should ever be a goal. I would always rather pick 25th than 5th, and I feel that to look at it any other way can only be disastrous.

SeanBCool,

I agree and disagree. Of course we wan't to win, but there's nothing wrong with being a realist and seeing the silver lining. A high draft pick would allow us to pick a franchise quarterback, and a quarterback who can stay on the field. We will make progress, but anyone counting on us winning more than 6-7 games will likely end up disappointed. It's not impossibe, just unlikely.

Michael,

No news on Glenn. Anything we reported at this hour would be premature and basically just pulled out of our ass. Knowing Carl, it will take some time. But at his position it isn't as big of a deal as other positions. In fact, signing a DT early might be less important than any other position. If he stays in shape, that is.

MasterBlaster:

Your comment about hoping the Chiefs go 3-13 or 4-12 again so that we can get a high draft pick horrifies me. That kind of mentality only works in places like Detroit and, oh wait, it doesn't work there.

You can't lose to get better. Getting better requires progress as a team. Another ugly season will be nothing but bad news for us.

This Walter Football article is by far the most pessimistic thing I've read on any subject in recent memory. Take everything it says there with about a pound of salt.

As far as the right side of the line goes, I'm actually concerned too. Even the usually positive kcchiefs.com mentions that McIntosh and Jones are only there because so far no one has stepped up to challenge them. It's not looking good and I have a feeling our most succesful runs this year will be to our left side if something isn't resolved.

As far as our defense, there's no definitive middle linebacker right now, and Donnie Edwards isn't performing up to Gun's expectations. So yes, the Linebacker situation is a bit of a mess as it stands now.

The "Herm Edwards play-calling" comment really made me scratch my head. Some NFL coaches DO call their own plays, but it's rare and it's certainly not the case in Kansas City. Although come to think of it, Herm may make the decisions as far as "run or pass". If anyone knows for sure, let me know. I'm curious.

Yeah, I read this article and it REALLY pissed me off. I am in Norway trying to find good info on the team and instead pick a thread like this one. That jerk needs his fingers cut off for the comments on our defense. I am laughing now because I read the full article and missed that the idiot called Ty a safety. That shows how much stock should be put into ANY prediction by this moron. I think we will either get 4-6 six wins this year. The offense will be easier and Chan has a habit of making QB's and Offenses in general pretty darn good. I will be back in San Diego by Tuesday evening so keep up the great work guys and do me a favor? Find out ANY info you can on how close or far off we are from signing GD. Thanks!!!

As for Colquitt, I don't think the media or other fans know much about punters. Not a very glamorous or talked about position. I don't think our record will be very good in 2008 either, but this preview was off. What I do think is that we will show a lot of promise, especially our youngs not named Croyle, and come on late. Remember, teams that come on late often play well in the following couple of seasons.

wow! this guy is an f'n moron! yeah the chiefs had a bad 2007 season, but what does that have to do with 2008? but really this whole "evaluation" is what sucked the most. this is probably the worst 2008 chiefs "prediction post" ive read this year..

Scott:

Thanks for the compliment. I don't understand the media. I don't expect to be good next year, but that is not it. There seems to be an attitude in some of the pieces. That part, I do not get. When I was reading Walter's article, I got the impression that he was trying to rip us unfairly. Did you read his whole article? He referred to Colquitt as 'OK'. He is a very good punter, he is far from OK. I would have disected the entire article, but then I would be writing a thesis.

Merlinnj, thanks for dissecting that garbage piece. I was thinking the same stuff and somebody had to do it.

I don't understand all the anti-Chiefs media lately. I guess these two-bit keyboard jockeys think it's a pretty safe bet that we'll suck next year, so they just let fly with whatever, with no regard for research at all.

Pretty much the only point he made is that CP is a jackass for not replacing the o-line talent and that's old news.

I think anyone's evaluation of next years chiefs (except for within the chiefs organization) is pointless. There are SOOOOOOOOO many variables that play out all season long which makes predictions almost nearly impossible. I remember last season it was the Browns who were among those predicted to tank.. the year before it was the Titans.. both teams did fairly well if i remember correctly and both teams were in pretty much the same boat we are in now. Predicting the NFL is damn near impossible. If it were easy, why are football analysts writing columns.. they should be in Vegas betting on games and laughing all the way to the bank. Instead they are sitting naked in front of their laptops eating twinkies (that was not completely directed at Whitlock) and giving us half-assed predictions based on information that is rarely accurate. I'm excited for the Chiefs. We have a young team with a ton of potential.

MasterBlaster, I think there really isn't any good reason to make a trade to pick up another QB at this point. I'm really not on board with Croyle at QB, but if he ends up having another bad year, we could get a franchise guy early in the draft, maybe our line will be somewhat stabilized, and that QB would have a lot of weapons if our young receivers develop. Plus, I think our 3rd rounders are all three gonna be great pros.

my first post was a joke, I don't expect to get top billing with links.

I think the chiefs fall somewhere between our optimisim (also WPI's OTA report optimism) and Walters Pesamism about the chiefs. I hope we do go 3 and 13, or 4 and 12 again. I'm all about having one more draft like this one before we begin our rise. I also think, if we only win 3 or 4 games, it wont be because of our lack of fresh tallent; it will be because of a young team cutting it's teeth, shody play calls, some timing issues (herm) and just general disharmony on both the offense and defense in terms of penalties, fumbles, etc. as they learn to play together as a team in the NFL Oh, and because Brodie Croyle sucks.

I still think we should have traded 2 3rds to get ahold of Brian Brohm in the second. I'd trade Cottom/Morgan Cottom/Charles for Brohm.

Ok, let the flaming begin, haha.

There's no trumping here, we just keep the good content flowing. Thats why we have ten posts on the front page. We also have had a boost in traffic the last few days, and really wanted to show all the newbies what A.A. is all about. Great work all around, boys.

Oh hell I forgot the D-Bo Interview didn't even get top billing for 24 hours. So a links post is never going to get that kind of priority :)