<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Grade The 2006 Draft&#8230;So Far</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/05/19/grade-the-2006-draftso-far/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/05/19/grade-the-2006-draftso-far/</link>
	<description>A Kansas City Chiefs Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 00:18:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Double D</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/05/19/grade-the-2006-draftso-far/#comment-14850</link>
		<dc:creator>Double D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 15:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/05/19/grade-the-2006-draftso-far/#comment-14850</guid>
		<description>xxxlp - you are correct, I was limiting my assessment to the 2006 draft class.  You make fair points on Page too.

I guess at least part of my perspective on this goes back to the proposition that you really can&#039;t do an appropriate evaluation after only 2 seasons.  Other than Hali, none of these guys really contributed signficantly in their rookie season so I think that leaves us with little choice but evaluate them predominately on their 2007 season.  Several of these guys were first-time starters for a team that went 4-12. The previous year, when they were not starters, their team went to the playoffs. That says something to me.

On the other side of the coin, I also say you can&#039;t call Pollard, Croyle, or really anybody else a bust after what amounts to just a single season of significant playing time.  I do expect a lot out a number of these guys.  I expect Hali and Pollard to both have break out seasons for instance. I have high hopes for Croyle and Webb. All of these guys have potential or else they wouldn&#039;t be here. All were still developing last year and this coming season should speak volumes about where they are in their career and how well they start coming together as a team.

Some of the criticism they deserve and some of it they don&#039;t but more than anything inexperience is their biggest weakness and their is a cure for that.

And yes I absolutely do believe that one of the core messages that players need to hear and believe from their coach is that if you lose, you lose as a team and when you win, you win as a team.  I would sure hope that Jared Allen and Tony G never went around the lockerroom claiming personal &quot;A&quot; performances after a losing effort and I doubt they ever felt that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>xxxlp &#8211; you are correct, I was limiting my assessment to the 2006 draft class.  You make fair points on Page too.</p>
<p>I guess at least part of my perspective on this goes back to the proposition that you really can&#8217;t do an appropriate evaluation after only 2 seasons.  Other than Hali, none of these guys really contributed signficantly in their rookie season so I think that leaves us with little choice but evaluate them predominately on their 2007 season.  Several of these guys were first-time starters for a team that went 4-12. The previous year, when they were not starters, their team went to the playoffs. That says something to me.</p>
<p>On the other side of the coin, I also say you can&#8217;t call Pollard, Croyle, or really anybody else a bust after what amounts to just a single season of significant playing time.  I do expect a lot out a number of these guys.  I expect Hali and Pollard to both have break out seasons for instance. I have high hopes for Croyle and Webb. All of these guys have potential or else they wouldn&#8217;t be here. All were still developing last year and this coming season should speak volumes about where they are in their career and how well they start coming together as a team.</p>
<p>Some of the criticism they deserve and some of it they don&#8217;t but more than anything inexperience is their biggest weakness and their is a cure for that.</p>
<p>And yes I absolutely do believe that one of the core messages that players need to hear and believe from their coach is that if you lose, you lose as a team and when you win, you win as a team.  I would sure hope that Jared Allen and Tony G never went around the lockerroom claiming personal &#8220;A&#8221; performances after a losing effort and I doubt they ever felt that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krans</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/05/19/grade-the-2006-draftso-far/#comment-14857</link>
		<dc:creator>Krans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 04:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/05/19/grade-the-2006-draftso-far/#comment-14857</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re grading purely on players and talent so far and if so thats fine but if you are grading a draft you have to consider value considering where they were drafted and how good they&#039;ve played compared to what is expected there. With that said

Page is an A: Because if you can find a starter in the 7th round thats pretty ridiculous, great pick and hes done more than enough considering where they got him. Now hopefully he can step it up another notch.

Webb similar story, he hasnt been spectacular but hes been ok considering where he was taken</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re grading purely on players and talent so far and if so thats fine but if you are grading a draft you have to consider value considering where they were drafted and how good they&#8217;ve played compared to what is expected there. With that said</p>
<p>Page is an A: Because if you can find a starter in the 7th round thats pretty ridiculous, great pick and hes done more than enough considering where they got him. Now hopefully he can step it up another notch.</p>
<p>Webb similar story, he hasnt been spectacular but hes been ok considering where he was taken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xxxlp</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/05/19/grade-the-2006-draftso-far/#comment-14849</link>
		<dc:creator>xxxlp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 03:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/05/19/grade-the-2006-draftso-far/#comment-14849</guid>
		<description>Merlinnj, I think he means &#039;the 2006 draft class&#039; has to earn their spots. Not proven veteran anchors such as Brian Waters or Tony G. Those guys are at the top of their respective positions, they don&#039;t have to earn diddly squat. They&#039;ll be there, and they&#039;ll be starters, providing they&#039;re healthy. *Knock on wood*

On another note... matt, we don&#039;t need another linebacker, especially one with character issues, especially when he was a former high pick, and wants tons of cash thrown at him. So no-go on that one. Pollard is far from a bust.. he&#039;s made some spectacular plays.. And he has a job to do; he couldn&#039;t wait to see if Ty Law would be able to keep his feet during the play.. He had a specific spot on the field, or a specific man, he had to keep track of. He couldn&#039;t do his job AND Ty Law&#039;s job, but he was consistently asked to. Can&#039;t blame a guy for giving it his all when he&#039;s been given more than he can handle. To his credit he did have a decent season, despite being in the shadow of &#039;big names&#039; on our team.

And Page isn&#039;t just a C+ IMO, if you indeed took a &#039;good coache&#039;s&#039; approach, then you should realize that beating a division rival is KEY for any coach. Page has singlehandedly saved us from the Raiders twice in his young career, on awesome picks. Both were in the redzone (I believe all of his picks are? I&#039;m too lazy to check, but I think so. That&#039;s huge, especially for a young guy.) And both picks versus the Raider&#039;s were in the waning seconds of the game. As a &#039;good head coach&#039;, when would you like your players to step up? That&#039;s right, down in the nitty gritty 4th quarter, time running out, game on the line.. Page has done that. Let&#039;s not forget the sharing of time with a Pro-Bowler in Greg Wesley, and you begin to see that Page&#039;s season was actually alot better than expected, and again, as Seanbcool has stated; it&#039;s their second years.. They aren&#039;t even fully developed. Let&#039;s give the kids a chance, but looking at it now, safety is a position we don&#039;t have to worry about for at least a few years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Merlinnj, I think he means &#8216;the 2006 draft class&#8217; has to earn their spots. Not proven veteran anchors such as Brian Waters or Tony G. Those guys are at the top of their respective positions, they don&#8217;t have to earn diddly squat. They&#8217;ll be there, and they&#8217;ll be starters, providing they&#8217;re healthy. *Knock on wood*</p>
<p>On another note&#8230; matt, we don&#8217;t need another linebacker, especially one with character issues, especially when he was a former high pick, and wants tons of cash thrown at him. So no-go on that one. Pollard is far from a bust.. he&#8217;s made some spectacular plays.. And he has a job to do; he couldn&#8217;t wait to see if Ty Law would be able to keep his feet during the play.. He had a specific spot on the field, or a specific man, he had to keep track of. He couldn&#8217;t do his job AND Ty Law&#8217;s job, but he was consistently asked to. Can&#8217;t blame a guy for giving it his all when he&#8217;s been given more than he can handle. To his credit he did have a decent season, despite being in the shadow of &#8216;big names&#8217; on our team.</p>
<p>And Page isn&#8217;t just a C+ IMO, if you indeed took a &#8216;good coache&#8217;s&#8217; approach, then you should realize that beating a division rival is KEY for any coach. Page has singlehandedly saved us from the Raiders twice in his young career, on awesome picks. Both were in the redzone (I believe all of his picks are? I&#8217;m too lazy to check, but I think so. That&#8217;s huge, especially for a young guy.) And both picks versus the Raider&#8217;s were in the waning seconds of the game. As a &#8216;good head coach&#8217;, when would you like your players to step up? That&#8217;s right, down in the nitty gritty 4th quarter, time running out, game on the line.. Page has done that. Let&#8217;s not forget the sharing of time with a Pro-Bowler in Greg Wesley, and you begin to see that Page&#8217;s season was actually alot better than expected, and again, as Seanbcool has stated; it&#8217;s their second years.. They aren&#8217;t even fully developed. Let&#8217;s give the kids a chance, but looking at it now, safety is a position we don&#8217;t have to worry about for at least a few years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: merlinnj</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/05/19/grade-the-2006-draftso-far/#comment-14848</link>
		<dc:creator>merlinnj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 01:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/05/19/grade-the-2006-draftso-far/#comment-14848</guid>
		<description>DD:

You wrote:

&quot;Merlin - I’m just taking the view that I think any good coach would after the team’s performance last season.&quot;

Nope, sorry, I do not agree. Your argument essentially boils down to: we suck = you all sucked.

So, if Jared Allen was still on this team, your &quot;good coach&quot; approach would say that he has to earn a starting spot on this team. Sorry, but I do not consider that a realistic approach or an approach used by a &#039;good coach&#039;.

So, in your view, Brian Waters has to earn a starting spot. Tony Gonzalez has to earn a starting spot. IMO, this is not an approach used by a good coach. Now, Herm is creating competition at a number of positions. This is a good thing. However, baring major surprises, there are several spots already claimed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DD:</p>
<p>You wrote:</p>
<p>&#8220;Merlin &#8211; I’m just taking the view that I think any good coach would after the team’s performance last season.&#8221;</p>
<p>Nope, sorry, I do not agree. Your argument essentially boils down to: we suck = you all sucked.</p>
<p>So, if Jared Allen was still on this team, your &#8220;good coach&#8221; approach would say that he has to earn a starting spot on this team. Sorry, but I do not consider that a realistic approach or an approach used by a &#8216;good coach&#8217;.</p>
<p>So, in your view, Brian Waters has to earn a starting spot. Tony Gonzalez has to earn a starting spot. IMO, this is not an approach used by a good coach. Now, Herm is creating competition at a number of positions. This is a good thing. However, baring major surprises, there are several spots already claimed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 267/289 objects using apc

Served from: arrowheadaddict.com @ 2012-05-24 22:10:38 -->

<!-- W3 Total Cache: Object Cache debug info:
Engine:             apc
Caching:            enabled
Total calls:        289
Cache hits:         267
Cache misses:       22
Total time:         0.0000
W3TC Object Cache info:
    # |     Status      |     Source      | Data size (b) | Query time (s) | ID:Group
-->
