<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Merlin&#8217;s 2008 Chiefs Draft Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/04/29/merlins-2008-chiefs-draft-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/04/29/merlins-2008-chiefs-draft-review/</link>
	<description>A Kansas City Chiefs Blog, No 12-step program required.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:55:57 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: seanbcool</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/04/29/merlins-2008-chiefs-draft-review/comment-page-3/#comment-12460</link>
		<dc:creator>seanbcool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 15:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/04/29/merlins-2008-chiefs-draft-review/#comment-12460</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure why anyone is bitching about Bernard Pollard not tackling anyone... he had 90 tackles (74 solo) in the 2007 season.  Troy Polamalu has only topped 90 tackles twice in his career, and that guy is EVERYWHERE.

I&#039;m really excited about the Chiefs draft this year.  We got so much VALUE in our picks.  Brandon Flowers, Jamaal Charles, Barry Richardson, and DaJuan Morgan are all examples of players we probably got steals with.

For anyone worried about any off-field issues or character concerns, don&#039;t.  I don&#039;t think Herm would look seriously at any straight up thugs (Pacman Jones, Chris Henry, etc.) and I think he deals well with the &quot;troubled&quot; players that have been selected (haven&#039;t had any problems with Tank Tyler, have we?)

Anyway.. looking forward to this season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure why anyone is bitching about Bernard Pollard not tackling anyone&#8230; he had 90 tackles (74 solo) in the 2007 season.  Troy Polamalu has only topped 90 tackles twice in his career, and that guy is EVERYWHERE.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m really excited about the Chiefs draft this year.  We got so much VALUE in our picks.  Brandon Flowers, Jamaal Charles, Barry Richardson, and DaJuan Morgan are all examples of players we probably got steals with.</p>
<p>For anyone worried about any off-field issues or character concerns, don&#8217;t.  I don&#8217;t think Herm would look seriously at any straight up thugs (Pacman Jones, Chris Henry, etc.) and I think he deals well with the &#8220;troubled&#8221; players that have been selected (haven&#8217;t had any problems with Tank Tyler, have we?)</p>
<p>Anyway.. looking forward to this season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/04/29/merlins-2008-chiefs-draft-review/comment-page-3/#comment-12345</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 00:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/04/29/merlins-2008-chiefs-draft-review/#comment-12345</guid>
		<description>i agree with john as well.  If there would of been a solid prospect on the oline in the 3rd we should of taken him, but since there wast bpa was the best approach.  And i think that charles coming in to spell lj and coming in on 3rd down will do alot for our feeble offense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree with john as well.  If there would of been a solid prospect on the oline in the 3rd we should of taken him, but since there wast bpa was the best approach.  And i think that charles coming in to spell lj and coming in on 3rd down will do alot for our feeble offense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/04/29/merlins-2008-chiefs-draft-review/comment-page-3/#comment-12343</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 23:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/04/29/merlins-2008-chiefs-draft-review/#comment-12343</guid>
		<description>Jay:

Here is more confirmation from one of the better NFL writers-Rick Gosselin, Dallas Morning News-in his May 6 article grading the 32 team drafts. (He also describes his methodology, which most do not.)

Anyway, he gave the Chiefs the only A+ for 2008, the first A-range grade he has given us in 17 years. More important, he said that according to his 500-player board, developed through his extensive contacts with NFL teams themselves, the Chiefs:

1. Only had 1 minor reach, our R5 pick CB Brandon Carr, to whom he had given an R6 grade; and

2. The Chiefs had 7 picks to whom he had given R3 or higher grades.  (Presumably, these 7 are our first 7, through WR Will Franklin in R4.)

&quot;Just the facts ma&#039;am; just the facts.&quot; (Sergeant Joe Friday, Dragnet)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay:</p>
<p>Here is more confirmation from one of the better NFL writers-Rick Gosselin, Dallas Morning News-in his May 6 article grading the 32 team drafts. (He also describes his methodology, which most do not.)</p>
<p>Anyway, he gave the Chiefs the only A+ for 2008, the first A-range grade he has given us in 17 years. More important, he said that according to his 500-player board, developed through his extensive contacts with NFL teams themselves, the Chiefs:</p>
<p>1. Only had 1 minor reach, our R5 pick CB Brandon Carr, to whom he had given an R6 grade; and</p>
<p>2. The Chiefs had 7 picks to whom he had given R3 or higher grades.  (Presumably, these 7 are our first 7, through WR Will Franklin in R4.)</p>
<p>&#8220;Just the facts ma&#8217;am; just the facts.&#8221; (Sergeant Joe Friday, Dragnet)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jay</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/04/29/merlins-2008-chiefs-draft-review/comment-page-3/#comment-12337</link>
		<dc:creator>jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 22:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/04/29/merlins-2008-chiefs-draft-review/#comment-12337</guid>
		<description>I Agree 100% John.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I Agree 100% John.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/04/29/merlins-2008-chiefs-draft-review/comment-page-3/#comment-12315</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 13:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/04/29/merlins-2008-chiefs-draft-review/#comment-12315</guid>
		<description>More info. on Chiefs&#039; R3 draft debate in KC Star this am.  Adam Teicher quotes former Washington and Houston GM Charley Casserly:

&quot;The best thing they did was stay disciplined in the draft...They could have gone and drafted five offensive linemen right off the bat, but if they did that, maybe four of them can&#039;t play.  What good does that do for them.

&quot;There was an elite group of offensive linemen in the draft this year.  The Chiefs got one of them.  That group went faster than anybody thought.  So if they would have drafted an offensive in the second round, they would have been getting a third-or fourth-round offensive lineman.  They didn&#039;t do that, and they should be commended for that.&quot;

Questions: 

1.If only 3rd or 4th round-value OLs were available at pick #35, when the Chiefs drafted CB Flowers (a late R1 value), wonder what value OLs were available in R3 @#73, 76 and 82?--certainly NOT R3 value.

2.What round value did they actually get in R3?--arguably R2 value with at least 2 of their 3 picks--RB Charles and S Morgan. 

3.Which approach is more likely to lead to a stronger, rebuilt Chiefs team in 2-3 years?--game, set and match to the Chiefs!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More info. on Chiefs&#8217; R3 draft debate in KC Star this am.  Adam Teicher quotes former Washington and Houston GM Charley Casserly:</p>
<p>&#8220;The best thing they did was stay disciplined in the draft&#8230;They could have gone and drafted five offensive linemen right off the bat, but if they did that, maybe four of them can&#8217;t play.  What good does that do for them.</p>
<p>&#8220;There was an elite group of offensive linemen in the draft this year.  The Chiefs got one of them.  That group went faster than anybody thought.  So if they would have drafted an offensive in the second round, they would have been getting a third-or fourth-round offensive lineman.  They didn&#8217;t do that, and they should be commended for that.&#8221;</p>
<p>Questions: </p>
<p>1.If only 3rd or 4th round-value OLs were available at pick #35, when the Chiefs drafted CB Flowers (a late R1 value), wonder what value OLs were available in R3 @#73, 76 and 82?&#8211;certainly NOT R3 value.</p>
<p>2.What round value did they actually get in R3?&#8211;arguably R2 value with at least 2 of their 3 picks&#8211;RB Charles and S Morgan. </p>
<p>3.Which approach is more likely to lead to a stronger, rebuilt Chiefs team in 2-3 years?&#8211;game, set and match to the Chiefs!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jay</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/04/29/merlins-2008-chiefs-draft-review/comment-page-3/#comment-12231</link>
		<dc:creator>jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 13:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/04/29/merlins-2008-chiefs-draft-review/#comment-12231</guid>
		<description>Zing! MB strikes again.  And proves my point again.  Intelligent discourse, nope I&#039;ll just berate the other side because I don&#039;t have a clear point.  Olive branch...I&#039;ll agree to disagree with you, if you can refrain from taking a dig in your next response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zing! MB strikes again.  And proves my point again.  Intelligent discourse, nope I&#8217;ll just berate the other side because I don&#8217;t have a clear point.  Olive branch&#8230;I&#8217;ll agree to disagree with you, if you can refrain from taking a dig in your next response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MasterBlaster</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/04/29/merlins-2008-chiefs-draft-review/comment-page-3/#comment-12220</link>
		<dc:creator>MasterBlaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 02:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/04/29/merlins-2008-chiefs-draft-review/#comment-12220</guid>
		<description>Yes, agree to disagree, John.


Agree to have you put on a mild sedative, Jay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, agree to disagree, John.</p>
<p>Agree to have you put on a mild sedative, Jay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/04/29/merlins-2008-chiefs-draft-review/comment-page-3/#comment-12217</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 02:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/04/29/merlins-2008-chiefs-draft-review/#comment-12217</guid>
		<description>MB:

1. No flies at all on your quals.  Hope you get to use your international law training whenever you choose.

2. I have no problems with poker; just never had the time or the inclination to master it.  Just threw in the lottery comment, because I consider it &quot;voluntary&quot; taxation and I pay enough taxes as it is.

3. I don&#039;t think the Chiefs were trying to maximize or minimize their number of 2008 wins.  I think they are trying to build a sustainable championship calibre team over a somewhat longer time frame.  With that as their goal, they have to take their BPAs.  The cumulative 3-5 year difference in overall roster strength of taking their BPAs vs. drafting for the next season&#039;s needs is huge, especially since they are now managing their roster in such a way as to increase their number of draft picks.  I know I am getting old enough that my brain is getting all used up (as my youngest informed me nearly a decade ago), but the logic of deliberately drafting, either in whole or in part, to maximize the value of future year picks escapes me or strikes as me as too clever by half.

Otherwise, we just have to agree to disagree and drive on, as I promised xxxlp.

Good luck.

ps With respect to your proposed Middle East solution, perhaps you should stick to poker!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MB:</p>
<p>1. No flies at all on your quals.  Hope you get to use your international law training whenever you choose.</p>
<p>2. I have no problems with poker; just never had the time or the inclination to master it.  Just threw in the lottery comment, because I consider it &#8220;voluntary&#8221; taxation and I pay enough taxes as it is.</p>
<p>3. I don&#8217;t think the Chiefs were trying to maximize or minimize their number of 2008 wins.  I think they are trying to build a sustainable championship calibre team over a somewhat longer time frame.  With that as their goal, they have to take their BPAs.  The cumulative 3-5 year difference in overall roster strength of taking their BPAs vs. drafting for the next season&#8217;s needs is huge, especially since they are now managing their roster in such a way as to increase their number of draft picks.  I know I am getting old enough that my brain is getting all used up (as my youngest informed me nearly a decade ago), but the logic of deliberately drafting, either in whole or in part, to maximize the value of future year picks escapes me or strikes as me as too clever by half.</p>
<p>Otherwise, we just have to agree to disagree and drive on, as I promised xxxlp.</p>
<p>Good luck.</p>
<p>ps With respect to your proposed Middle East solution, perhaps you should stick to poker!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jay</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/04/29/merlins-2008-chiefs-draft-review/comment-page-3/#comment-12214</link>
		<dc:creator>jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 00:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/04/29/merlins-2008-chiefs-draft-review/#comment-12214</guid>
		<description>MB, I&#039;m glad to see how copious amounts of schooling in psych and law don&#039;t teach you anything about making a clear and valid argument.  All you&#039;ve done is contradict yourself and then claim that I can&#039;t handle your massive intellectual prowess.  You&#039;re an ego-maniac, and arguing with someone who belittles anyone who disagrees with them is...is...wait, are you Dick Cheney?  It all makes sense now!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MB, I&#8217;m glad to see how copious amounts of schooling in psych and law don&#8217;t teach you anything about making a clear and valid argument.  All you&#8217;ve done is contradict yourself and then claim that I can&#8217;t handle your massive intellectual prowess.  You&#8217;re an ego-maniac, and arguing with someone who belittles anyone who disagrees with them is&#8230;is&#8230;wait, are you Dick Cheney?  It all makes sense now!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MasterBlaster</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/04/29/merlins-2008-chiefs-draft-review/comment-page-2/#comment-12211</link>
		<dc:creator>MasterBlaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 22:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/04/29/merlins-2008-chiefs-draft-review/#comment-12211</guid>
		<description>100th post!

Lets see if this thread dies now.  I&#039;m game for 200! haha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>100th post!</p>
<p>Lets see if this thread dies now.  I&#8217;m game for 200! haha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
