<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jared Allen Overrated?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/04/20/jared-allen-overrated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/04/20/jared-allen-overrated/</link>
	<description>A Kansas City Chiefs Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:41:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: aaasports</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/04/20/jared-allen-overrated/#comment-13479</link>
		<dc:creator>aaasports</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 08:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/04/20/jared-allen-overrated/#comment-13479</guid>
		<description>I think that JA is not the answer to all the problems, which player is.  But JA is a great component of the defense and to lose him would be a great loss.  They should do what they can to keep JA and try to build around him.  Develop him more into a leader and continue to get better on defense.  Why keep starting over and let him go in hopes we can draft well for another player.  It takes time to develop new players.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that JA is not the answer to all the problems, which player is.  But JA is a great component of the defense and to lose him would be a great loss.  They should do what they can to keep JA and try to build around him.  Develop him more into a leader and continue to get better on defense.  Why keep starting over and let him go in hopes we can draft well for another player.  It takes time to develop new players.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CalChief1</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/04/20/jared-allen-overrated/#comment-13478</link>
		<dc:creator>CalChief1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 03:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/04/20/jared-allen-overrated/#comment-13478</guid>
		<description>You ungrateful and forgetful &quot;fans&quot; should be ashamed of yourselves!  I remember when Jared was drafted and these same pages were loaded with you &quot;knowledgeable&quot; pundits all crying the blues about the &quot;wasted pick&quot; and the stupidity of the Chiefs for taking the &quot;overrated D1-AA&quot; player. Then the tide changed and my prediction that he would show a high motor and great skill came 100% true. He was that way in High School, did it in college , and has been a great and under-rated professional. Now, he slipped up and the DUI issues did occur but he has learned from it and , in spite of his corrections, King Carl  has led a concerted campaign to press him down and not pay him the raise he has earned thru nothing less than hard work and effort.

When he was drafted to KC I said that he had gone to NFL Heaven... a place with history, great fans, and a commitment to players and winning. Given the same opportunity to say it to him again I&#039;d say they ARE history, the fans can be great but fickle, and the commitment that the Chiefs have to players is to keep them at the lowest price and win if that happens to occur. Wave goodbye to all the sacks and personality folks because the Cheaps have earned it again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You ungrateful and forgetful &#8220;fans&#8221; should be ashamed of yourselves!  I remember when Jared was drafted and these same pages were loaded with you &#8220;knowledgeable&#8221; pundits all crying the blues about the &#8220;wasted pick&#8221; and the stupidity of the Chiefs for taking the &#8220;overrated D1-AA&#8221; player. Then the tide changed and my prediction that he would show a high motor and great skill came 100% true. He was that way in High School, did it in college , and has been a great and under-rated professional. Now, he slipped up and the DUI issues did occur but he has learned from it and , in spite of his corrections, King Carl  has led a concerted campaign to press him down and not pay him the raise he has earned thru nothing less than hard work and effort.</p>
<p>When he was drafted to KC I said that he had gone to NFL Heaven&#8230; a place with history, great fans, and a commitment to players and winning. Given the same opportunity to say it to him again I&#8217;d say they ARE history, the fans can be great but fickle, and the commitment that the Chiefs have to players is to keep them at the lowest price and win if that happens to occur. Wave goodbye to all the sacks and personality folks because the Cheaps have earned it again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Y</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/04/20/jared-allen-overrated/#comment-13477</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Y</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 00:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/04/20/jared-allen-overrated/#comment-13477</guid>
		<description>Adam, the problem I have is that top 5 or top 10 picks are rarely viewed as competition for the starting job. They&#039;re viewed as the starter of the team -- it&#039;s only a matter of &quot;when.&quot; It&#039;s very difficult to visualize a $60 Million man on the bench.

And so, there are two situations where this move becomes a waste. #1 - if Croyle does awesome and you sit the $60 Million man on the bench; #2 - if Ryan is a bust and the Chiefs never replace him, because they give him 4 chances to blossom as an NFL QB. The first is important, because it implies that you&#039;re wasting money on a player who doesn&#039;t see the field, but it also implies that you used a pick on a backup QB when you could have landed a full-time defensive or offensive tackle. In the second situation, we&#039;ve seen too many instances of QBs who start for several years not because of how they do on the field, but because of where they were drafted. Harrington and Boller played well past their usefulness. Leftwich started even after Garrard was the obviously superior QB. How many years did Houston refuse to draft/sign a QB because they were waiting for Carr&#039;s potential to finally develop? I realize there are risks to be taken, I just happen to think that if your goal is to promote a pure QB competition, why not just use your second round pick on a QB instead? Who knows, maybe the Chiefs get a pick at #17 and use it instead on Brian Brohm, who I believe is superior to Ryan anyway.

A QB outside of the first round is cheaper, has to legitimately win a starting job instead of having it handed to him, and is a legit enough threat to take the starting job that Croyle will feel compelled to perform or die. The Browns had it right last year. Remember, there was buzz that they&#039;d take Brady Quinn because they badly needed a QB; they went with Joe Thomas instead and that worked out great for them.

I would argue that if Quinn was drafted at #3, Derek Anderson either would ahve been benched halfway through last season or he would not have been re-signed for 2008.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam, the problem I have is that top 5 or top 10 picks are rarely viewed as competition for the starting job. They&#8217;re viewed as the starter of the team &#8212; it&#8217;s only a matter of &#8220;when.&#8221; It&#8217;s very difficult to visualize a $60 Million man on the bench.</p>
<p>And so, there are two situations where this move becomes a waste. #1 &#8211; if Croyle does awesome and you sit the $60 Million man on the bench; #2 &#8211; if Ryan is a bust and the Chiefs never replace him, because they give him 4 chances to blossom as an NFL QB. The first is important, because it implies that you&#8217;re wasting money on a player who doesn&#8217;t see the field, but it also implies that you used a pick on a backup QB when you could have landed a full-time defensive or offensive tackle. In the second situation, we&#8217;ve seen too many instances of QBs who start for several years not because of how they do on the field, but because of where they were drafted. Harrington and Boller played well past their usefulness. Leftwich started even after Garrard was the obviously superior QB. How many years did Houston refuse to draft/sign a QB because they were waiting for Carr&#8217;s potential to finally develop? I realize there are risks to be taken, I just happen to think that if your goal is to promote a pure QB competition, why not just use your second round pick on a QB instead? Who knows, maybe the Chiefs get a pick at #17 and use it instead on Brian Brohm, who I believe is superior to Ryan anyway.</p>
<p>A QB outside of the first round is cheaper, has to legitimately win a starting job instead of having it handed to him, and is a legit enough threat to take the starting job that Croyle will feel compelled to perform or die. The Browns had it right last year. Remember, there was buzz that they&#8217;d take Brady Quinn because they badly needed a QB; they went with Joe Thomas instead and that worked out great for them.</p>
<p>I would argue that if Quinn was drafted at #3, Derek Anderson either would ahve been benched halfway through last season or he would not have been re-signed for 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.P.</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/04/20/jared-allen-overrated/#comment-13476</link>
		<dc:creator>R.P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/04/20/jared-allen-overrated/#comment-13476</guid>
		<description>Concerning DT&#039;s, it is a fact that they rarely make a huge impact as a rookie individually for several reasons, including the fact that they are facing grown men in the NFL who bench 600 pounds, are readily doubled if need be (Dorsey and Ellis could split doubles in college no problem, will be a problem at the pro level).  The impact that they make is on every other player on the defense. I think we are one stud DT away from being DOMINANT on D.  If Tank can bring it his soph year and Boone keeps it together and we draft Dorsey or Ellis, the D will be sick even if we say goodbye to J.A.  I am a very optimistic thinker by nature and if we can dominate the game defensively, the O will look a lot better than it has</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Concerning DT&#8217;s, it is a fact that they rarely make a huge impact as a rookie individually for several reasons, including the fact that they are facing grown men in the NFL who bench 600 pounds, are readily doubled if need be (Dorsey and Ellis could split doubles in college no problem, will be a problem at the pro level).  The impact that they make is on every other player on the defense. I think we are one stud DT away from being DOMINANT on D.  If Tank can bring it his soph year and Boone keeps it together and we draft Dorsey or Ellis, the D will be sick even if we say goodbye to J.A.  I am a very optimistic thinker by nature and if we can dominate the game defensively, the O will look a lot better than it has</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

