<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bye, Bye Jared Allen?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/04/17/bye-bye-jared-allen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/04/17/bye-bye-jared-allen/</link>
	<description>A Kansas City Chiefs Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 00:18:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Dustan</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/04/17/bye-bye-jared-allen/#comment-13055</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 21:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/04/17/bye-bye-jared-allen/#comment-13055</guid>
		<description>I guess that you don&#039;t have to pick a DE with the #5 but you have to admit that we are losing ground at RE with that scenario.  There is NO WAY you can put Turk anywhere even close to the same league as JA right now so I guess you mortgage some of the best of the defense to buy some offense.  Yes Turk was a second and JA was a 4th but the round a player is picked in only carries him so far.  After a while he has to start earning the position.

I know I sound like I hate this idea but the thing is I don&#039;t see enough up side.  We know what we have with JA and we know he is dominate.  It&#039;s not like we are talking about a mediocre player here, he is the sack leader in the league.  That WILL hurt our defense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess that you don&#8217;t have to pick a DE with the #5 but you have to admit that we are losing ground at RE with that scenario.  There is NO WAY you can put Turk anywhere even close to the same league as JA right now so I guess you mortgage some of the best of the defense to buy some offense.  Yes Turk was a second and JA was a 4th but the round a player is picked in only carries him so far.  After a while he has to start earning the position.</p>
<p>I know I sound like I hate this idea but the thing is I don&#8217;t see enough up side.  We know what we have with JA and we know he is dominate.  It&#8217;s not like we are talking about a mediocre player here, he is the sack leader in the league.  That WILL hurt our defense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/04/17/bye-bye-jared-allen/#comment-13054</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 12:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/04/17/bye-bye-jared-allen/#comment-13054</guid>
		<description>Well I am not 100% sold that you HAVE TO pick a DE. Herm feels confident that Turk can play so why not give him a shot. He was a second round pick.

Hell we let Kris Wilson and the rest of Dick-V&#039;s crew run around for a few years. If we are going to rebuild might as well see what we got.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I am not 100% sold that you HAVE TO pick a DE. Herm feels confident that Turk can play so why not give him a shot. He was a second round pick.</p>
<p>Hell we let Kris Wilson and the rest of Dick-V&#8217;s crew run around for a few years. If we are going to rebuild might as well see what we got.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dustan</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/04/17/bye-bye-jared-allen/#comment-13053</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 12:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/04/17/bye-bye-jared-allen/#comment-13053</guid>
		<description>What MasterBlaster is saying is that we would have to use the first rounder that we get from MN to replace the player that we are trading so that first round pick is void.  I think of it a little more harsh than that even.  I think that if you truly want to replace JA then you have to use the #5 pick.  In that scenario you trade JA for an unproven player and now you only have a lower 1st rnd and another 2nd.  This would take away the chance to pick any player you want with #5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What MasterBlaster is saying is that we would have to use the first rounder that we get from MN to replace the player that we are trading so that first round pick is void.  I think of it a little more harsh than that even.  I think that if you truly want to replace JA then you have to use the #5 pick.  In that scenario you trade JA for an unproven player and now you only have a lower 1st rnd and another 2nd.  This would take away the chance to pick any player you want with #5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ComeSackMyQB</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/04/17/bye-bye-jared-allen/#comment-13013</link>
		<dc:creator>ComeSackMyQB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 03:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/04/17/bye-bye-jared-allen/#comment-13013</guid>
		<description>sorry..i meant make him stay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry..i meant make him stay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 267/289 objects using apc

Served from: arrowheadaddict.com @ 2012-05-24 20:44:19 -->

<!-- W3 Total Cache: Object Cache debug info:
Engine:             apc
Caching:            enabled
Total calls:        289
Cache hits:         267
Cache misses:       22
Total time:         0.0000
W3TC Object Cache info:
    # |     Status      |     Source      | Data size (b) | Query time (s) | ID:Group
-->
