Fan-Sided Blogs | Fan-Sided Forums | Mock Draft Database  
21 Mar

Stray Arrows: No Hair Pulling In Football?

Stray Arrows (AA)Remember when Larry Johnson got pissed a few years back when Troy Polamalu was running back a turnover and threw him around by his locks WWE style? (how anyone could forget the severe beating we took after the infamous sex toy-conference fiasco in Pittsburgh is beyond me.)Well, it looks like that may have been the motivation for a new proposed rule change–because of the Chiefs. From AOL Fanhouse:

Adam Schefter reported on NFL Network that the NFL’s competition committee is considering a rule that would bar a player from wearing his hair long enough on the field to obscure his name on the back of his jersey. Players like Polamalu and Jaguars cornerback Rashaen Mathis would either need to get a haircut or figure out a way to stuff all that hair in their helmets throughout a game.

According to Schefter, the Kansas City Chiefs proposed the rule change, perhaps motivated by the incident in October 2006, when Chiefs running back Larry Johnson pulled Polamalu’s hair to drag him down from behind — which is legal — and then held onto the hair after both players hit the ground, drawing an unnecessary roughness penalty.

I don’t know about this. I don’t want anybody telling me how to cut my hair. Then again, my hair is buzzed. Also, there are bosses out there who don’t allow employees to have long hair, so this wouldn’t be that unprecedented. My thing is, if players want to take the risk of having long hair out there on the field, isn’t that their problem?

Email This Post Print This Post Ballhype: hype it up!

11 Responses to “Stray Arrows: No Hair Pulling In Football?”

  1. 1
    Jeremy (Riverside, CA) Says:

    Agreed, if it is deemed part of a Jersey, than you can grab it and use it to tackle.

  2. 2
    Chris Says:

    Are the Chiefs setting the stage for a major comeback by Jason Dunn?

  3. 3
    merlinnj Says:

    I do not see a problem in a team limiting hair growth. I am a Yankee fan and we have had that for decades.

  4. 4
    Adam Says:

    Merlinnj, why did you have to go and do that? The Yankees?

  5. 5
    merlinnj Says:

    Sorry Adam. I hadn’t brought it up before, but it does fit with the topic. Just why do you think there is a NJ on the end of my name? ;)

  6. 6
    Adam Says:

    Thats, OK, especially since you are from those parts. Just don’t slam us for being loyal Royals fans.

  7. 7
    mike Says:

    Long hair? Why not? Might as well get some high heels, some nice lace and ruffles trim for the jerseys, and wouldn’t a dress allow for more freedom and air movement when those sweaty mens hit a home run?

  8. 8
    Tim Says:

    Congratulations on spelling Polamalu’s name correctly.

  9. 9
    merlinnj Says:

    Adam: I would never slam any real fan of any team. However, being a Yankee fan does give me an interesting perspective. I know what is like to build a good team of character players, and watch it go downhill when you bring in too many high priced free agents. Football, more so than baseball, is a chemistry game. Give me a Derek Jeter anyday over other shortstops with gaudier stats.  

  10. 10
    Zahradnik21 Says:

    If they want to have long hair and they don’t care getting pulled down by it that who cares bout making it illegal for long hair. Wheh they start crying bout it than thats there own probelm. They want long hair and than take them down by it.

  11. 11
    Crane Says:

    More of the sissy-fication of America….no dodge ball, no bb gun on Christmas morning, no yanking Samoan retards down by the hair.  The French are gonna out macho America soon.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

© 2008 Arrowhead Addict | A Kansas City Chiefs Sports Blog & Fan-Sided Blogs | Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS) |

Home | Register | About | Sitemap | Contact