<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chiefs Interested In Hadnot?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/03/10/chiefs-interested-in-hadnot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/03/10/chiefs-interested-in-hadnot/</link>
	<description>A Kansas City Chiefs blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:41:23 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: UCrawford</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/03/10/chiefs-interested-in-hadnot/comment-page-1/#comment-11490</link>
		<dc:creator>UCrawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/03/10/chiefs-interested-in-hadnot/#comment-11490</guid>
		<description>And Antonio Bryant&#039;s got serious problems...not the kind of guy you want anywhere near the Chiefs locker room.&#160; I&#039;m betting that&#039;s not going to go well for the Bucs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Antonio Bryant&#8217;s got serious problems&#8230;not the kind of guy you want anywhere near the Chiefs locker room.&nbsp; I&#8217;m betting that&#8217;s not going to go well for the Bucs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UCrawford</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/03/10/chiefs-interested-in-hadnot/comment-page-1/#comment-11489</link>
		<dc:creator>UCrawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/03/10/chiefs-interested-in-hadnot/#comment-11489</guid>
		<description>The Miami line were actually good run-blockers last year (when their running backs could stay healthy) and Hadnot was only 26 (and decently rated) so it probably would have been worth the two year contract he got from the Browns.&#160; About the only player left on the market worth targeting is Max Starks...beyond that the Chiefs might as well stay out of free agency from this point on because thanks to Carl and Herm&#039;s idiotic do-nothing &quot;strategy&quot; there&#039;s not much left to pick through for talented players that would fit a rebuilding effort.&#160; David Stewart maybe (although he&#039;s a restricted free agent so likely not worth a contract and a draft pick).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Miami line were actually good run-blockers last year (when their running backs could stay healthy) and Hadnot was only 26 (and decently rated) so it probably would have been worth the two year contract he got from the Browns.&nbsp; About the only player left on the market worth targeting is Max Starks&#8230;beyond that the Chiefs might as well stay out of free agency from this point on because thanks to Carl and Herm&#8217;s idiotic do-nothing &quot;strategy&quot; there&#8217;s not much left to pick through for talented players that would fit a rebuilding effort.&nbsp; David Stewart maybe (although he&#8217;s a restricted free agent so likely not worth a contract and a draft pick).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigchief13</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/03/10/chiefs-interested-in-hadnot/comment-page-1/#comment-11488</link>
		<dc:creator>bigchief13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/03/10/chiefs-interested-in-hadnot/#comment-11488</guid>
		<description>very nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Double D</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/03/10/chiefs-interested-in-hadnot/comment-page-1/#comment-11487</link>
		<dc:creator>Double D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/03/10/chiefs-interested-in-hadnot/#comment-11487</guid>
		<description>In summary, had not Hadnot signed elsewhere, we could have had Hadnot, or not. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In summary, had not Hadnot signed elsewhere, we could have had Hadnot, or not. <img src='http://arrowheadaddict.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
