<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Champagne Wishes And Caviar Dreams?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/02/21/no-champagne-wishes-and-caviar-dreams/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/02/21/no-champagne-wishes-and-caviar-dreams/</link>
	<description>A Kansas City Chiefs Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 07:42:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: redbeard</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/02/21/no-champagne-wishes-and-caviar-dreams/#comment-10191</link>
		<dc:creator>redbeard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 03:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/02/21/no-champagne-wishes-and-caviar-dreams/#comment-10191</guid>
		<description>Adam I have seen them in the super bowl and I have seen them win it...I also saw them loose it as well...hahaha even the DT deff. unit teams didnt come close to them...not even close. and on Offense the team had two wideouts a tight end and running backs,&#160; so Offensively the Chiefs really do need a second big time wideout... and a O-line... Why in the world do people want so badly to have the Chiefs sign free agent linemen... yes they do have some good ones out there, but I would much rather have a guy like Fitz, come in here from ARIZONA... and draft the O-line... the way I see it we get one of the top two Left Tackles... and can grab a guard who can and will probably start... this would allow us to have two linemen who would both be with us for a long time!!!!! As we have our center of the future... he played right tackle last year and I loved what I saw. so after this draft we would have three out of five linemen start playing together now... left tackle , center, and right guard....&#160; selecting the correct second day players will be what to watch for this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam I have seen them in the super bowl and I have seen them win it&#8230;I also saw them loose it as well&#8230;hahaha even the DT deff. unit teams didnt come close to them&#8230;not even close. and on Offense the team had two wideouts a tight end and running backs,&nbsp; so Offensively the Chiefs really do need a second big time wideout&#8230; and a O-line&#8230; Why in the world do people want so badly to have the Chiefs sign free agent linemen&#8230; yes they do have some good ones out there, but I would much rather have a guy like Fitz, come in here from ARIZONA&#8230; and draft the O-line&#8230; the way I see it we get one of the top two Left Tackles&#8230; and can grab a guard who can and will probably start&#8230; this would allow us to have two linemen who would both be with us for a long time!!!!! As we have our center of the future&#8230; he played right tackle last year and I loved what I saw. so after this draft we would have three out of five linemen start playing together now&#8230; left tackle , center, and right guard&#8230;.&nbsp; selecting the correct second day players will be what to watch for this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redbeard</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/02/21/no-champagne-wishes-and-caviar-dreams/#comment-10190</link>
		<dc:creator>redbeard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 03:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/02/21/no-champagne-wishes-and-caviar-dreams/#comment-10190</guid>
		<description>because he didnt do that much more than the guy we let go...honestly ADAM he played behind better DTs than a guy who was playing the same poss. the year before! CARL and other personell people figure we can do better with cheaper help, thats all that was with Harris... same as letting donnie go the first time. I think at linebacker the chiefs are ok, but they are getting older. And as I have said before, we need back up players who can play, not just be here as a cheap bench guy. I personally dont like starks... just me with that ... I dont like having him next to watters... Watters who looked screwed up allot last year, was because he plays better next to a left tackle who can play street ball... a brawler... finness tackles usually technich wise dont fit Watters style...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>because he didnt do that much more than the guy we let go&#8230;honestly ADAM he played behind better DTs than a guy who was playing the same poss. the year before! CARL and other personell people figure we can do better with cheaper help, thats all that was with Harris&#8230; same as letting donnie go the first time. I think at linebacker the chiefs are ok, but they are getting older. And as I have said before, we need back up players who can play, not just be here as a cheap bench guy. I personally dont like starks&#8230; just me with that &#8230; I dont like having him next to watters&#8230; Watters who looked screwed up allot last year, was because he plays better next to a left tackle who can play street ball&#8230; a brawler&#8230; finness tackles usually technich wise dont fit Watters style&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/02/21/no-champagne-wishes-and-caviar-dreams/#comment-10189</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 22:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/02/21/no-champagne-wishes-and-caviar-dreams/#comment-10189</guid>
		<description>Another question: What is everyone&#039;s problem with napoleon Harris? The guy played fine last year despite playing in a new system behind average DT play. He also has played in three different defenses over the past few years. Let&#039;s give this guy some time to gel before we go out a blow money on another LB. My God, I just don&#039;t get why we would bring in another LB. &lt;strong&gt;LB IS THE STRONGEST POSITION WE HAVE!&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another question: What is everyone&#8217;s problem with napoleon Harris? The guy played fine last year despite playing in a new system behind average DT play. He also has played in three different defenses over the past few years. Let&#8217;s give this guy some time to gel before we go out a blow money on another LB. My God, I just don&#8217;t get why we would bring in another LB. <strong>LB IS THE STRONGEST POSITION WE HAVE!</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/02/21/no-champagne-wishes-and-caviar-dreams/#comment-10188</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 22:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/02/21/no-champagne-wishes-and-caviar-dreams/#comment-10188</guid>
		<description>Big Baby&#039;s got a big-time weight problem. If we want a big-time DT, why not grab Dorsey or Ellis at five?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big Baby&#8217;s got a big-time weight problem. If we want a big-time DT, why not grab Dorsey or Ellis at five?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

