<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: $20 M-Plus To Spend, But On Whom?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/02/20/20-m-plus-to-spend-but-on-whom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/02/20/20-m-plus-to-spend-but-on-whom/</link>
	<description>A Kansas City Chiefs Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 17:41:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: redbeard</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/02/20/20-m-plus-to-spend-but-on-whom/#comment-10155</link>
		<dc:creator>redbeard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 03:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/02/20/20-m-plus-to-spend-but-on-whom/#comment-10155</guid>
		<description>John... say what...lol you do remember that Donnie played inside here in KC!!!!!!! hahahahaha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John&#8230; say what&#8230;lol you do remember that Donnie played inside here in KC!!!!!!! hahahahaha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redbeard</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/02/20/20-m-plus-to-spend-but-on-whom/#comment-10154</link>
		<dc:creator>redbeard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 03:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/02/20/20-m-plus-to-spend-but-on-whom/#comment-10154</guid>
		<description>Briggs would be a tremendous aquisition, and we dont even have to explain why there... talk about stopping the run... my only problem with him would be could he cover... as with our cover two system would make him have to try and stay with tight ends quit often.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Briggs would be a tremendous aquisition, and we dont even have to explain why there&#8230; talk about stopping the run&#8230; my only problem with him would be could he cover&#8230; as with our cover two system would make him have to try and stay with tight ends quit often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redbeard</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/02/20/20-m-plus-to-spend-but-on-whom/#comment-10153</link>
		<dc:creator>redbeard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 03:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/02/20/20-m-plus-to-spend-but-on-whom/#comment-10153</guid>
		<description>Briggs, Faneca, Stallworth, not having to be in that order...to me Faneca is the most wanted here... yes we need a left tackle but to me we need another inside guy who knows how to open a lane... Waters and Wiegman were hurting inside by having to hold up virtually all alone, and helping the outside with their jobs... signing Faneca would allow us to take a third round or fourth round guard... and open the draft up. releasing wellborne also tells you that he will be looked at hard by the CHIEFS this year... as for bringing in a Left tackle, well the ones you have listed are both ten times better than BIG MAC...lol, but by no means should they sign one of those left tackle&#160; free agents and not draft ***CLADY***... the youth of&#160; claddy or even god forbid it...long, is so needed on the o-line... this year we could possably see the chiefs draft a tackle a guard and a third lineman, the third could be a guard, or tackle... and remember we have a couple long snappers in this years draft... a young kid with a great back wouldnt be a bad idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Briggs, Faneca, Stallworth, not having to be in that order&#8230;to me Faneca is the most wanted here&#8230; yes we need a left tackle but to me we need another inside guy who knows how to open a lane&#8230; Waters and Wiegman were hurting inside by having to hold up virtually all alone, and helping the outside with their jobs&#8230; signing Faneca would allow us to take a third round or fourth round guard&#8230; and open the draft up. releasing wellborne also tells you that he will be looked at hard by the CHIEFS this year&#8230; as for bringing in a Left tackle, well the ones you have listed are both ten times better than BIG MAC&#8230;lol, but by no means should they sign one of those left tackle&nbsp; free agents and not draft ***CLADY***&#8230; the youth of&nbsp; claddy or even god forbid it&#8230;long, is so needed on the o-line&#8230; this year we could possably see the chiefs draft a tackle a guard and a third lineman, the third could be a guard, or tackle&#8230; and remember we have a couple long snappers in this years draft&#8230; a young kid with a great back wouldnt be a bad idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/02/20/20-m-plus-to-spend-but-on-whom/#comment-10152</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 23:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2008/02/20/20-m-plus-to-spend-but-on-whom/#comment-10152</guid>
		<description>I agree with Doube D! We gotta hype Max to the max!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Doube D! We gotta hype Max to the max!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 267/289 objects using apc

Served from: arrowheadaddict.com @ 2012-05-24 17:13:24 -->

<!-- W3 Total Cache: Object Cache debug info:
Engine:             apc
Caching:            enabled
Total calls:        289
Cache hits:         267
Cache misses:       22
Total time:         0.0000
W3TC Object Cache info:
    # |     Status      |     Source      | Data size (b) | Query time (s) | ID:Group
-->
