<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stray Arrows: The Law/Surtain Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/12/26/stray-arrows-the-lawsurtain-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/12/26/stray-arrows-the-lawsurtain-debate/</link>
	<description>A Kansas City Chiefs blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 06:46:06 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: redbeard</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/12/26/stray-arrows-the-lawsurtain-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-23518</link>
		<dc:creator>redbeard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 17:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/12/26/stray-arrows-the-lawsurtain-debate/#comment-23518</guid>
		<description>Zach your correct on holmes... as he was and has been on our cap room...sense he first arrived here in KC, although the league allows his time off as a different $ figuring into the cap... now that he has retired , that doesnt change anything... cap is still cap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zach your correct on holmes&#8230; as he was and has been on our cap room&#8230;sense he first arrived here in KC, although the league allows his time off as a different $ figuring into the cap&#8230; now that he has retired , that doesnt change anything&#8230; cap is still cap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/12/26/stray-arrows-the-lawsurtain-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-23517</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 20:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/12/26/stray-arrows-the-lawsurtain-debate/#comment-23517</guid>
		<description>Jon, the running bonus is for that season, so we would definitely get hit with that. I would also believe that we would get hit with a prorated amount of their signing bonus depending on how much is still owed. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;NFL numbers are very complicated and teams also give out limited information about their contracts. As we all know King Carl loves keeping his contracts a secret.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Priest Holmes retiring I think will not hurt our cap for the next season. The only thing that could hurt our cap I believe would be a bonus, but I would like to find out more about this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon, the running bonus is for that season, so we would definitely get hit with that. I would also believe that we would get hit with a prorated amount of their signing bonus depending on how much is still owed. </p>
<p>NFL numbers are very complicated and teams also give out limited information about their contracts. As we all know King Carl loves keeping his contracts a secret.</p>
<p>Priest Holmes retiring I think will not hurt our cap for the next season. The only thing that could hurt our cap I believe would be a bonus, but I would like to find out more about this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/12/26/stray-arrows-the-lawsurtain-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-23516</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 20:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/12/26/stray-arrows-the-lawsurtain-debate/#comment-23516</guid>
		<description>Zach, that&#039;s very interesting. Do you know if the &quot;running bonus&quot; refers to the cap hit we would take on for cutting any of these players early? Because if that&#039;s true, shouldn&#039;t that number also include prorated signing bonus money? I would imagine that if Law has about a $1 million difference between his salary and his actual cap hit that that $1 million represents the 2008 portion of the prorated signing bonus? These numbers seem to get more complicated every day but I do think it&#039;s fascinating to figure out how much we can save by cutting players. I&#039;m also curious about how Priest Holmes and company affect our payroll for next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zach, that&#8217;s very interesting. Do you know if the &quot;running bonus&quot; refers to the cap hit we would take on for cutting any of these players early? Because if that&#8217;s true, shouldn&#8217;t that number also include prorated signing bonus money? I would imagine that if Law has about a $1 million difference between his salary and his actual cap hit that that $1 million represents the 2008 portion of the prorated signing bonus? These numbers seem to get more complicated every day but I do think it&#8217;s fascinating to figure out how much we can save by cutting players. I&#8217;m also curious about how Priest Holmes and company affect our payroll for next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/12/26/stray-arrows-the-lawsurtain-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-23507</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 14:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/12/26/stray-arrows-the-lawsurtain-debate/#comment-23507</guid>
		<description>Merlinn -&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Hit us up with an email, we would love to have you do something. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;arrowheadaddict@gmail.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Merlinn -</p>
<p>Hit us up with an email, we would love to have you do something. </p>
<p><a href="mailto:arrowheadaddict@gmail.com">arrowheadaddict@gmail.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quick Hits... - KC Chiefs Fanatic - A hard-hitting, no holds barred, sports blog on the Kansas City Chiefs</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/12/26/stray-arrows-the-lawsurtain-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-23514</link>
		<dc:creator>Quick Hits... - KC Chiefs Fanatic - A hard-hitting, no holds barred, sports blog on the Kansas City Chiefs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 04:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/12/26/stray-arrows-the-lawsurtain-debate/#comment-23514</guid>
		<description>[...] Addict has the next installment in their &#8220;Stray Arrows&#8221; commentary up for all to read, and boy is this one good. This time they get into some salary cap [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Addict has the next installment in their &#8220;Stray Arrows&#8221; commentary up for all to read, and boy is this one good. This time they get into some salary cap [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/12/26/stray-arrows-the-lawsurtain-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-23515</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 02:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/12/26/stray-arrows-the-lawsurtain-debate/#comment-23515</guid>
		<description>I hope we get rid of them all. But remember we have about 5 years till we will reach the playoffs again. And that is if we get rid of mike solari , and that stupid idiot from new york</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope we get rid of them all. But remember we have about 5 years till we will reach the playoffs again. And that is if we get rid of mike solari , and that stupid idiot from new york</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: merlinnj</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/12/26/stray-arrows-the-lawsurtain-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-23513</link>
		<dc:creator>merlinnj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 00:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/12/26/stray-arrows-the-lawsurtain-debate/#comment-23513</guid>
		<description>With the salary cap, it&#039;s so hard to evaulate how to manage when to let older players go. The players I see as locks to be gone are Bell and Reed.&#160; Also, I can&#039;t see keeping both Law and Surtain. I have been playing with ideas in my head. If Adam and Zac allow me, I may have something for everyone to shoot at soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the salary cap, it&#8217;s so hard to evaulate how to manage when to let older players go. The players I see as locks to be gone are Bell and Reed.&nbsp; Also, I can&#8217;t see keeping both Law and Surtain. I have been playing with ideas in my head. If Adam and Zac allow me, I may have something for everyone to shoot at soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/12/26/stray-arrows-the-lawsurtain-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-23512</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 22:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/12/26/stray-arrows-the-lawsurtain-debate/#comment-23512</guid>
		<description>Time to clean house!!&#160; All of them should go.&#160; When your record is as bad as ours, we need to clean house.&#160; Do you really think that any of these guys has anything left?&#160; They have old legs!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time to clean house!!&nbsp; All of them should go.&nbsp; When your record is as bad as ours, we need to clean house.&nbsp; Do you really think that any of these guys has anything left?&nbsp; They have old legs!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/12/26/stray-arrows-the-lawsurtain-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-23511</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 22:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/12/26/stray-arrows-the-lawsurtain-debate/#comment-23511</guid>
		<description>Bell &amp; Surtain - good as goneWesley - could go either wayKennison &amp; Law - keep, even though Law is pretty expensive.&#160; How could we find 2 new starting corners in the same year when O-line needs to be the priority in the draft and free agency.&#160; Asante Samuel is probably too expensive, an remember, a player has to WANT to come to Kansas City.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bell &amp; Surtain &#8211; good as goneWesley &#8211; could go either wayKennison &amp; Law &#8211; keep, even though Law is pretty expensive.&nbsp; How could we find 2 new starting corners in the same year when O-line needs to be the priority in the draft and free agency.&nbsp; Asante Samuel is probably too expensive, an remember, a player has to WANT to come to Kansas City.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/12/26/stray-arrows-the-lawsurtain-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-23510</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 22:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/12/26/stray-arrows-the-lawsurtain-debate/#comment-23510</guid>
		<description>I think all of those players above should go. We don&#039;t need their services. I love Eddie and think he is a great guy, but I think it is time to move on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think all of those players above should go. We don&#8217;t need their services. I love Eddie and think he is a great guy, but I think it is time to move on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
