<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stray Arrows: The Law/Surtain Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/12/26/stray-arrows-the-lawsurtain-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/12/26/stray-arrows-the-lawsurtain-debate/</link>
	<description>A Kansas City Chiefs Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 05:58:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: redbeard</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/12/26/stray-arrows-the-lawsurtain-debate/#comment-23518</link>
		<dc:creator>redbeard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 17:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/12/26/stray-arrows-the-lawsurtain-debate/#comment-23518</guid>
		<description>Zach your correct on holmes... as he was and has been on our cap room...sense he first arrived here in KC, although the league allows his time off as a different $ figuring into the cap... now that he has retired , that doesnt change anything... cap is still cap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zach your correct on holmes&#8230; as he was and has been on our cap room&#8230;sense he first arrived here in KC, although the league allows his time off as a different $ figuring into the cap&#8230; now that he has retired , that doesnt change anything&#8230; cap is still cap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/12/26/stray-arrows-the-lawsurtain-debate/#comment-23517</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 20:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/12/26/stray-arrows-the-lawsurtain-debate/#comment-23517</guid>
		<description>Jon, the running bonus is for that season, so we would definitely get hit with that. I would also believe that we would get hit with a prorated amount of their signing bonus depending on how much is still owed. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;NFL numbers are very complicated and teams also give out limited information about their contracts. As we all know King Carl loves keeping his contracts a secret.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Priest Holmes retiring I think will not hurt our cap for the next season. The only thing that could hurt our cap I believe would be a bonus, but I would like to find out more about this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon, the running bonus is for that season, so we would definitely get hit with that. I would also believe that we would get hit with a prorated amount of their signing bonus depending on how much is still owed. </p>
<p>NFL numbers are very complicated and teams also give out limited information about their contracts. As we all know King Carl loves keeping his contracts a secret.</p>
<p>Priest Holmes retiring I think will not hurt our cap for the next season. The only thing that could hurt our cap I believe would be a bonus, but I would like to find out more about this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/12/26/stray-arrows-the-lawsurtain-debate/#comment-23516</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 20:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/12/26/stray-arrows-the-lawsurtain-debate/#comment-23516</guid>
		<description>Zach, that&#039;s very interesting. Do you know if the &quot;running bonus&quot; refers to the cap hit we would take on for cutting any of these players early? Because if that&#039;s true, shouldn&#039;t that number also include prorated signing bonus money? I would imagine that if Law has about a $1 million difference between his salary and his actual cap hit that that $1 million represents the 2008 portion of the prorated signing bonus? These numbers seem to get more complicated every day but I do think it&#039;s fascinating to figure out how much we can save by cutting players. I&#039;m also curious about how Priest Holmes and company affect our payroll for next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zach, that&#8217;s very interesting. Do you know if the &quot;running bonus&quot; refers to the cap hit we would take on for cutting any of these players early? Because if that&#8217;s true, shouldn&#8217;t that number also include prorated signing bonus money? I would imagine that if Law has about a $1 million difference between his salary and his actual cap hit that that $1 million represents the 2008 portion of the prorated signing bonus? These numbers seem to get more complicated every day but I do think it&#8217;s fascinating to figure out how much we can save by cutting players. I&#8217;m also curious about how Priest Holmes and company affect our payroll for next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach</title>
		<link>http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/12/26/stray-arrows-the-lawsurtain-debate/#comment-23507</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 14:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/12/26/stray-arrows-the-lawsurtain-debate/#comment-23507</guid>
		<description>Merlinn -&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Hit us up with an email, we would love to have you do something. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;arrowheadaddict@gmail.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Merlinn -</p>
<p>Hit us up with an email, we would love to have you do something. </p>
<p><a href="mailto:arrowheadaddict@gmail.com">arrowheadaddict@gmail.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 267/289 objects using apc

Served from: arrowheadaddict.com @ 2012-05-24 13:20:33 -->

<!-- W3 Total Cache: Object Cache debug info:
Engine:             apc
Caching:            enabled
Total calls:        289
Cache hits:         267
Cache misses:       22
Total time:         0.0000
W3TC Object Cache info:
    # |     Status      |     Source      | Data size (b) | Query time (s) | ID:Group
-->
