Comments on: Do You Go for Two? http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/10/22/do-you-go-for-2/ A Kansas City Chiefs blog Wed, 17 Mar 2010 02:04:17 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: CWebb http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/10/22/do-you-go-for-2/comment-page-1/#comment-22759 CWebb Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:20:45 +0000 http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/10/22/do-you-go-for-2/#comment-22759 <strong>Paradise - your eloquent blog-writing skills are only surpassed by your fine facial features.</strong> Anyone else want to agree with me? I've got compliments to pass around. Paradise – your eloquent blog-writing skills are only surpassed by your fine facial features. Anyone else want to agree with me? I've got compliments to pass around.

]]> By: Paradise http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/10/22/do-you-go-for-2/comment-page-1/#comment-22761 Paradise Tue, 23 Oct 2007 16:44:21 +0000 http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/10/22/do-you-go-for-2/#comment-22761 Scenario:  We go for one...We are up 6...on the first play of Oakland's drive, they pass to the wide receiver on a screen...Ty Law falls down...We lose. CWebb is on the money here.  You HAVE to go for two.  I can't even believe that WHAT?lock would argue otherwise! Scenario:  We go for one…We are up 6…on the first play of Oakland's drive, they pass to the wide receiver on a screen…Ty Law falls down…We lose. CWebb is on the money here.  You HAVE to go for two.  I can't even believe that WHAT?lock would argue otherwise!

]]> By: rockchalk http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/10/22/do-you-go-for-2/comment-page-1/#comment-22760 rockchalk Mon, 22 Oct 2007 23:32:47 +0000 http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/10/22/do-you-go-for-2/#comment-22760 i agree 100%.i would go for 2 every time in that situation, and agreed with herm when he did it. a good throw from damon (can we PLEASE play brodie croyle now????) and we go up 14-7. i agree 100%.i would go for 2 every time in that situation, and agreed with herm when he did it. a good throw from damon (can we PLEASE play brodie croyle now????) and we go up 14-7.

]]> By: CWebb http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/10/22/do-you-go-for-2/comment-page-1/#comment-22762 CWebb Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:25:43 +0000 http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/10/22/do-you-go-for-2/#comment-22762 Adam and John - I love you both. Thank you for seeing the light. Any way that someone can make this a poll on this post? Adam and John – I love you both. Thank you for seeing the light. Any way that someone can make this a poll on this post?

]]> By: John http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/10/22/do-you-go-for-2/comment-page-1/#comment-22763 John Mon, 22 Oct 2007 17:19:26 +0000 http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/10/22/do-you-go-for-2/#comment-22763 herm did the right thing...if you are up by 5 and don't make the conversion either 2 FG's or a TD beats you but if you make it 2 FG's still gives you the win...no question herm did the right thing...Page still saved our asses...again (best 7th round pick playing in the league right now, no doubt) herm did the right thing…if you are up by 5 and don't make the conversion either 2 FG's or a TD beats you but if you make it 2 FG's still gives you the win…no question herm did the right thing…Page still saved our asses…again (best 7th round pick playing in the league right now, no doubt)

]]> By: Zach http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/10/22/do-you-go-for-2/comment-page-1/#comment-22764 Zach Mon, 22 Oct 2007 17:10:27 +0000 http://arrowheadaddict.com/2007/10/22/do-you-go-for-2/#comment-22764 As a coach I understand what Herm was trying to do. He wanted to go up by a touchdown. I dont blame him. Sure we can all look back now and say he should have done this and that. HINDSIGHT IS 20-20. If they make it, then no one complains. They should have if the ref wasn't in D-BOs way. I like the call because it shows that he TRUSTS his offense.<br /><br />Now to Whitlock:<br />Jason "FATBOY" Whitlock is trying to say that the Oakland Offense hadn't done anything and Culpepper was inconsistent. Jason probably didn't even watch the game because he didn't remember Culpepper scoring on 2 plays against us. Also that his WRs were dropping everything in the world, not him missing the passes. Whitlock needs to stick to the national media because he has lost touch with the local sports. GET LOST FAT MAN! As a coach I understand what Herm was trying to do. He wanted to go up by a touchdown. I dont blame him. Sure we can all look back now and say he should have done this and that. HINDSIGHT IS 20-20. If they make it, then no one complains. They should have if the ref wasn't in D-BOs way. I like the call because it shows that he TRUSTS his offense.

Now to Whitlock:
Jason "FATBOY" Whitlock is trying to say that the Oakland Offense hadn't done anything and Culpepper was inconsistent. Jason probably didn't even watch the game because he didn't remember Culpepper scoring on 2 plays against us. Also that his WRs were dropping everything in the world, not him missing the passes. Whitlock needs to stick to the national media because he has lost touch with the local sports. GET LOST FAT MAN!

]]>