Comments on: The D-Bo Show: Tickets Going Fast

By: Gary

Gary — Fri, 05 Oct 2007 19:54:54 +0000

In addition to Rice being slow so were Chris Carter and Steve Largent. All of these had extremely good hands, which brings up D-Bo's cousin Sippio. He is still listed on the depth chart and likely knows the play book by now. Hopefully we will see him playing opposite D-Bo soon. Prior to the last game they prayed together in the end zone. BTW, it was D-Bo's mother who called and told him Sippio was his cousin.

By: redbeard

redbeard — Wed, 03 Oct 2007 00:35:37 +0000

AND AS FOR MY WANTING TO HOLD GRUDGES YES I STILL WANT THE CHIEFS TO GO BACK AND DRAFT MARINO INSTEAD OF BLACKLEDGE,… HAHAHAHAHA

By: redbeard

redbeard — Wed, 03 Oct 2007 00:34:43 +0000

LONG TERM WE NEED A TACKLE AND A GUARD AND A CENTER… AND THEN WE HAD TO… HAHAHAHA , I SEE NO DIFFERENCE IN MY SAYING WE NEED TO DRAFT A LINEMAN FOR THE LAST TWO OR EVEN THREE YEARS, WHEN I SEE ALL THESE PEOPLE SAYING AND LOOKING TO GRAB A VETERAN CORNER FORM ATLANTA… OR GRABBING THIS OR THAT DEFF. TACKLE…. , AND YES i AM CORRECT IN SAYING HE IS OUR NUMBER TWO EVEN IF HE IS OUR BEST RECIEVER AND I DONT HATE HIM, BUT HE HAS COST THIS TEAM AND LJ … SO ADMITT IT I AM RIGHT …

By: redbeard

redbeard — Wed, 03 Oct 2007 00:25:34 +0000

LET ME SHOW YOU SOMETHINGWE HAD CARSON AND PAGE, WERE THEY BOTH NUMBER ONE OR BOTH NUMBER TWO… SEE WHAT I MEAN…THE MEDIA AND SPROTS WRITERS HAVE OVER THE YEARS ACTUALLY CHANGED THE MEANINGS PEOPLE USE TODAY… IF YOUR BEST RECIEVER IS YOUR FLANKER THEN HE IS STILL YOUR NUMBER TWO!

By: redbeard

redbeard — Wed, 03 Oct 2007 00:22:51 +0000

RICE WASNT A NUMBER ONE… EVEN THOUGH HE WAS THE BEST RECIEVER… (BY THE WAY HE MADE MONTANA, HAHA JOE SUCKED )

By: rockchalk

rockchalk — Tue, 02 Oct 2007 22:53:53 +0000

you are wrong redbeard. the #1 receiver is not a burner by any means, it is just simply the best wide receiver on your team. just like bowe is. bowe is better than any tackle in the draft save thomas, and he was WELL gone by the team we picked, and it would have been a reach to take ugoh. its crazy IMO to still wish we drafted someone else…

By: Zach

Zach — Tue, 02 Oct 2007 17:42:02 +0000

oh and I think you already beat that horse to death. We know what we have so no need to use wishful thinking. Lets talk about the guys we have…

By: Zach

Zach — Tue, 02 Oct 2007 17:40:31 +0000

Jerry Rice was by no means a "burner" and he is the greatest WR of all-time.

Moss would be horrible on the Chiefs. Here is why:

1. He would have Huard throwing to him not Tom Brady.

2. Chiefs are 2-2 and not 4-0. Once Moss is on a .500 team he quits.

I really think the Patriots was the only place Moss was going to suceed. Without Moss I still believe the Patriots would be 4-0 and the Chiefs without Bowe could be as bad as 0-4. So I think that is what Adam is saying when he says who is more important to their team.

Redbeard just admit that you hate the guy

By: Adam

Adam — Tue, 02 Oct 2007 06:24:32 +0000

Honestly, it is easier to find a good tackle than it is to find a WR like D-B0. When it's all said in done I'm confident he'll be one of the top ten WRs in the league. He's that good.

And the No. 1 WR is your go-to receiver, regardless of if he plays X, Y, Z, flanker, split end, etc… No. 1 is a media term for a team's best WR. Bowe is already our best receiver. I call him our number one, because he's going to lead our receivers in targets, snaps, receptions, etc.

By: redbeard

redbeard — Tue, 02 Oct 2007 06:05:10 +0000

and I hope people would realise that I think Jared shouldnt have been called a drunk and needs to proove himself …oh wait he did proove himself and will more than likely cost us alot more to keep him here this next year… wait maybe we can have our def. tackle/ def. end pick take over for him next year…. and as for bowe he is a number two reciever…this doesnt mean he is worse people… over the years number one and number two has somehow switched into is a guy a good or bad reciever… this isnt the case… the number one is the burner, plain and simple…. bowe is more the possesion reciever alah the number two wideout. and yes we need him but where is our money being spent on LJ and his sub par year… according to alot of writers, earlier in the year we needed to sign lj because his years of availability are dwindling… hahahahaha well here is another year… waisted of LJ… and if people could see we now have zero tackles… and a center who will most likly retire next year… and a guard in watters who wont last that much longer…. and in wellbourne who isnt a spring chicken… * so yes I say we still should have drafted a tackle this year and last.* for the good of this team long term that is what they needed to do.PERIOD….